All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>,
	John Keeping <john@metanate.com>,
	buildroot@buildroot.org
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/openssh: backport upstream fix for 32-bit
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 17:24:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220312162401.GG283544@scaer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ce1b58b-7721-a63a-4503-11e89fd55f22@mind.be>

Arnout, Peter, All,

On 2022-03-12 17:00 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle spake thusly:
> On 11/03/2022 08:24, Peter Seiderer wrote:
> >But the sha1 alone does not tell to which git repo it belongs to, but the explicit
> >upstream link does (and has the nice effect to gain a one-click link to the
> >corresponding patch/merge-request etc.) and is a prominent remainder in case
> >of package version bump where the patch comes from...
>  I don't know about you, but the normal way that I generate patches is to
> clone the repo and do 'git format-patch -1 <sha1>', and then add my SoB. And
> if it doesn't apply cleanly, I first do 'git cherry-pick -x -s'.

Exactly what I do too, with an additional tag just before my SoB:
    [yann.morin.1998@free.fr: backport from upstream]
    Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>

>  Obviously it's helpful to have a link there. However, requiring
> contributors to go and find the upstream web frontend and construct a URL is
> IMHO asking a lot, especially since chances are that no one is ever going to
> actually look at that link. There's already plenty of steps a contributor
> has to go through, I don't want to increase the threshold even more.

I fully subscribe to Arnout's position.

I only add an URL to the original patch if it was grabbed fro; a pending
PR/MR/BZ/.. or a third-party tree.

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-12 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-10 14:03 [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/openssh: backport upstream fix for 32-bit John Keeping
2022-03-10 20:38 ` Peter Seiderer
2022-03-10 21:03   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2022-03-11  7:24     ` Peter Seiderer
2022-03-12 16:00       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2022-03-12 16:24         ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2022-03-18  8:42 ` Peter Korsgaard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220312162401.GG283544@scaer \
    --to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
    --cc=arnout@mind.be \
    --cc=buildroot@buildroot.org \
    --cc=john@metanate.com \
    --cc=ps.report@gmx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.