From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54158C433F5 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:01:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=/hoAY0kyqzuXtfrgGNI2tlDRjz/6Hkf957hlN1DteyY=; b=R31h3tNI2kTvTS K4JxIHgAyMlH/z4gXLiLTWEvBRUGX7UlZf1hNNf0ZUYMggfEoQ33l9TAIMZOGtSpPs9p0jybUC3AB avHxjZwrwpEb6U0v29h7GRrNyYRv4lraSXMas9J95u0TD42slu+CjWMAW3rCjY9YFVJ14fU5bP4Qr 3SpJtoP3H+LwDi7X+i81szl1TwGWy81UTW7Y2auplA2DKn8YUL3ghNXZqgqWHAxCZ5kVDFX0XAKfN iECk7mNg8CdOZB9DMszURCqnq9cyf+f/rdaFiHaNs993sOyojwMxaI5t8Py1C7T/IfZFL/mTzsc33 Bl7kQ10uzYF/VCTrZwVw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nTBfx-00224w-Pb; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:01:33 +0000 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nTBfu-00223e-IP; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:01:31 +0000 X-UUID: 5e3099a226374f0d84fa83f49b38c482-20220312 X-UUID: 5e3099a226374f0d84fa83f49b38c482-20220312 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 752179623; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 17:01:26 -0700 Received: from mtkexhb01.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.102) by MTKMBS62DR.mediatek.inc (172.29.94.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 16:01:24 -0800 Received: from mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.40) by mtkexhb01.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 08:01:10 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07.mediatek.inc (172.21.84.99) by mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 08:01:10 +0800 From: Miles Chen To: CC: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: mediatek: fix side effect of mt8195 sram power on Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 08:01:10 +0800 Message-ID: <20220313000110.3869-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 In-Reply-To: <202203120056.qtDEVoye-lkp@intel.com> References: <202203120056.qtDEVoye-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220312_160130_652454_2F81D114 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.26 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Tinghan, > 418 | MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c:418:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c: In function 'mt8195_scp_stop': > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c:592:28: error: 'MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS'? > 592 | MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS I tested this patch and it can should be caught by the internal build test. Could you do the test before submitting patches out? Thanks, Miles _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145A8C433F5 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229836AbiCMACd (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Mar 2022 19:02:33 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44934 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233113AbiCMACc (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Mar 2022 19:02:32 -0500 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com (unknown [210.61.82.184]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1CE41F1603; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 16:01:21 -0800 (PST) X-UUID: 7da47bb1aa4e4a15a61988cc10ddf0dc-20220313 X-UUID: 7da47bb1aa4e4a15a61988cc10ddf0dc-20220313 Received: from mtkexhb01.mediatek.inc [(172.21.101.102)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (Generic MTA with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 49272585; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 08:01:16 +0800 Received: from mtkexhb01.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.102) by mtkmbs07n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 08:01:15 +0800 Received: from mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.40) by mtkexhb01.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 08:01:10 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07.mediatek.inc (172.21.84.99) by mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 08:01:10 +0800 From: Miles Chen To: CC: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: mediatek: fix side effect of mt8195 sram power on Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 08:01:10 +0800 Message-ID: <20220313000110.3869-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 In-Reply-To: <202203120056.qtDEVoye-lkp@intel.com> References: <202203120056.qtDEVoye-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MTK: N Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org Hi Tinghan, > 418 | MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c:418:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c: In function 'mt8195_scp_stop': > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c:592:28: error: 'MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS'? > 592 | MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS I tested this patch and it can should be caught by the internal build test. Could you do the test before submitting patches out? Thanks, Miles From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87F69C433F5 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:02:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=oNWVH7I6vGcHnk0aQ5Ti66WRgr7YEl2E41g19vryPRU=; b=SIQ10xIhnktnlo 7/a9pnJT/8nuap89+S64lhd+U/+ikMMZSYlEWZgqIlp9XBDa73jckpWAt1gqShb4X/H1fYiyq2fNK sHIOPTJDlJdH5Fr768H4aadXQNVfp59ndpEwQZQa8Of9JhCHS6+txyWDJQSqrfsFSYryTKxboFlaI EZEVFPh+J4dXlE/3SeuPxddFI8f8CtdPZ6SHpvJNJVXPev9f6wDPbmunxyHpURZmWSbh9Sfhn3v8f h2p2+u7ZJLf085tL/6WXgSysSyAda4lEJNxkmIT3AEQmsqfyXsmmY2h6gMf6j1Hdoif3FYGMK/gDy 7ShByacA86h9/+CAcJ9w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nTBfz-002252-3o; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:01:35 +0000 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nTBfu-00223e-IP; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:01:31 +0000 X-UUID: 5e3099a226374f0d84fa83f49b38c482-20220312 X-UUID: 5e3099a226374f0d84fa83f49b38c482-20220312 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 752179623; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 17:01:26 -0700 Received: from mtkexhb01.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.102) by MTKMBS62DR.mediatek.inc (172.29.94.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 16:01:24 -0800 Received: from mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.40) by mtkexhb01.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 08:01:10 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07.mediatek.inc (172.21.84.99) by mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 08:01:10 +0800 From: Miles Chen To: CC: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: mediatek: fix side effect of mt8195 sram power on Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 08:01:10 +0800 Message-ID: <20220313000110.3869-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 In-Reply-To: <202203120056.qtDEVoye-lkp@intel.com> References: <202203120056.qtDEVoye-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220312_160130_652454_2F81D114 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.26 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Tinghan, > 418 | MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c:418:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c: In function 'mt8195_scp_stop': > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c:592:28: error: 'MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS'? > 592 | MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS I tested this patch and it can should be caught by the internal build test. Could you do the test before submitting patches out? Thanks, Miles _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4443766348734887985==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Miles Chen To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: mediatek: fix side effect of mt8195 sram power on Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 08:01:10 +0800 Message-ID: <20220313000110.3869-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> In-Reply-To: <202203120056.qtDEVoye-lkp@intel.com> List-Id: --===============4443766348734887985== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Tinghan, > 418 | MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_B= ITS > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c:418:27: note: each undeclared identifier = is reported only once for each function it appears in > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c: In function 'mt8195_scp_stop': > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c:592:28: error: 'MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RES= ERVED_BITS' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MT8195_L= 1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS'? > 592 | MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS= ); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_= BITS I tested this patch and it can should be caught by the internal build test. Could you do the test before submitting patches out? Thanks, Miles --===============4443766348734887985==--