From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Bang Li <libang.linuxer@gmail.com>
Cc: naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com,
davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Allow both @symbol_name and @addr to exist
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 17:36:46 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220313173646.e3d797f9ee3105239179fb5d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220313032125.124094-1-libang.linuxer@gmail.com>
On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 11:21:25 +0800
Bang Li <libang.linuxer@gmail.com> wrote:
> If the address found by the @symbol_name is equal to the @addr, this case
> should be considered a valid parameter combinations.
Could you tell me the reason why this is needed and use case?
I explictly made this case as an error, because I couldn't find
any good reason to support this case.
Thank you,
>
> Example:
>
> static struct kprobe kp = {
> .symbol_name = "kernel_clone",
> .addr = (kprobe_opcode_t*)kernel_clone,
> };
>
> Signed-off-by: Bang Li <libang.linuxer@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/kprobes.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 94cab8c9ce56..70d4ed9e7dc7 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -1497,13 +1497,19 @@ bool within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
> static kprobe_opcode_t *_kprobe_addr(kprobe_opcode_t *addr,
> const char *symbol_name, unsigned int offset)
> {
> - if ((symbol_name && addr) || (!symbol_name && !addr))
> + kprobe_opcode_t *symbol_addr;
> +
> + if (!symbol_name && !addr)
> goto invalid;
>
> if (symbol_name) {
> - addr = kprobe_lookup_name(symbol_name, offset);
> - if (!addr)
> + symbol_addr = kprobe_lookup_name(symbol_name, offset);
> + if (!symbol_addr)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> +
> + if (addr && symbol_addr != addr)
> + goto invalid;
> + addr = symbol_addr;
> }
>
> addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)(((char *)addr) + offset);
> @@ -2062,8 +2068,7 @@ bool __weak arch_kprobe_on_func_entry(unsigned long offset)
> * function entry address or not.
> * This returns 0 if it is the function entry, or -EINVAL if it is not.
> * And also it returns -ENOENT if it fails the symbol or address lookup.
> - * Caller must pass @addr or @sym (either one must be NULL), or this
> - * returns -EINVAL.
> + * Caller must pass @addr or @sym, or this returns -EINVAL.
> */
> int kprobe_on_func_entry(kprobe_opcode_t *addr, const char *sym, unsigned long offset)
> {
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-13 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-13 3:21 [PATCH] kprobes: Allow both @symbol_name and @addr to exist Bang Li
2022-03-13 8:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2022-03-15 13:56 ` 李棒
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220313173646.e3d797f9ee3105239179fb5d@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=libang.linuxer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.