From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] rcu: Perform early sequence fetch for polling locklessly
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 15:42:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220316144255.336021-4-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220316144255.336021-1-frederic@kernel.org>
The workqueue ordering guarantees that the work sees all the accesses
of the task prior to its call to the corresponding queue_work().
Therefore the sequence to poll can be retrieved locklessly.
The only downside is that it is then possible to miss the 0x1 flag set
by a prior work. But this could already happen concurrently anyway after
the exp_poll_lock is unlocked. In the worst case the slow path involving
synchronize_rcu_expedited() takes care of the situation.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 763ec35546ed..c4a19c6a83cf 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -909,9 +909,7 @@ static void sync_rcu_do_polled_gp(struct work_struct *wp)
struct rcu_node *rnp = container_of(wp, struct rcu_node, exp_poll_wq);
unsigned long s;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->exp_poll_lock, flags);
- s = rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq;
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->exp_poll_lock, flags);
+ s = READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq);
if (s & 0x1)
return;
while (!sync_exp_work_done(s))
@@ -919,7 +917,7 @@ static void sync_rcu_do_polled_gp(struct work_struct *wp)
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->exp_poll_lock, flags);
s = rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq;
if (!(s & 0x1) && sync_exp_work_done(s))
- rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq |= 0x1;
+ WRITE_ONCE(rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq, s | 0x1);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->exp_poll_lock, flags);
}
@@ -949,7 +947,7 @@ unsigned long start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
if (rcu_init_invoked())
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->exp_poll_lock, flags);
if ((rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq & 0x1) || ULONG_CMP_LT(rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq, s)) {
- rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq = s;
+ WRITE_ONCE(rnp->exp_seq_poll_rq, s);
if (rcu_init_invoked())
queue_work(rcu_gp_wq, &rnp->exp_poll_wq);
}
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-16 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-16 14:42 [RFC PATCH 0/4] rcu: Expedited GP polling improvements Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-16 14:42 ` [PATCH 1/4] rcu: Remove needless polling work requeue for further waiter Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-16 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] rcu: No need to reset the poll request flag before completion Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-30 11:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-30 17:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-16 14:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2022-03-16 14:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] rcu: Name internal polling flag Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-17 9:42 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2022-03-17 15:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-22 2:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-22 10:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-03-24 1:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-24 1:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220316144255.336021-4-frederic@kernel.org \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
--cc=uladzislau.rezki@sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.