Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] nbd/server: Allow MULTI_CONN for shared writable exports

["Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 04:15:53PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 04:07:21PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 01:14:41PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > The patches seem OK to me, but I don't really know enough about the
> > > internals of qemu-nbd to give a line-by-line review.  I did however
> > > build and test qemu-nbd with the patches:
> > > 
> > >   $ ./build/qemu-nbd /var/tmp/test.qcow2 
> > >   $ nbdinfo nbd://localhost
> > >   ...
> > > 	can_multi_conn: false
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   $ ./build/qemu-nbd -e 2 /var/tmp/test.qcow2 
> > >   $ nbdinfo nbd://localhost
> > >   ...
> > > 	can_multi_conn: false
> > > 
> > > ^^^ Is this expected?  It also happens with -e 0.
> > 
> > Yes, because qemu-nbd defaults to read-write connections, but to be
> > conservative, this patch defaults '-m auto' to NOT advertise
> > multi-conn for read-write; you need to be explicit:
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   $ ./build/qemu-nbd -e 2 -m on /var/tmp/test.qcow2 
> > >   $ nbdinfo nbd://localhost
> > >   ...
> > > 	can_multi_conn: true
> > 
> > either with '-m on' as you did here, or with
> > 
> > build/qemu-nbd -r -e 2 /var/tmp/test.qcow2
> > 
> > where the '-m auto' default exposes multi-conn for a readonly client.
> 
> I hit send prematurely - one more thought I wanted to make clear.  For
> _this_ series, the behavior of '-m auto' depends solely on readonly
> vs. read-write; that being the most conservative choice of preserving
> pre-existing qemu-nbd behavior (that is, if you don't use -m, the only
> change in behavior should be the fact that --help output now lists
> -m).
> 
> But in future versions of qemu, we might be able to improve '-m auto'
> to also take into consideration whether the backing image of a
> read-write device is known-cache-consistent (such as a local file
> system), where we can then manage to default to advertising multi-conn
> for those writable images, while still avoiding the advertisement when
> exposing other devices such as network-mounted devices where we are
> less confident on whether there are sufficient cache consistency
> guarantees.  Use of explicit '-m off' or '-m on' gives guaranteed
> results no matter the qemu version, so it is only explicit (or
> implied) '-m auto' where we might get smarter defaults over time.
> 
> Thus testing whether advertising multi-conn makes a difference in
> other tools like nbdcopy thus requires checking if qemu-nbd is new
> enough to support -m, and then being explicit that we are opting in to
> using it.

I see.  The commit message of patch 3 confused me because
superficially it seems to say that multi-conn is safe (and therefore I
assumed safe == enabled) when backed by a local filesystem.  Could the
commit message be improved to list the default for common combinations
of flags?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/