From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] acpi/pci_root: negotiate CXL _OSC
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 11:25:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202203171123.Jy0945To-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220317002704.1835870-3-vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Hi Vishal,
[FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.]
[auto build test WARNING on 74be98774dfbc5b8b795db726bd772e735d2edd4]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vishal-Verma/acpi-add-support-for-CXL-_OSC/20220317-082840
base: 74be98774dfbc5b8b795db726bd772e735d2edd4
config: x86_64-randconfig-a001 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220317/202203171123.Jy0945To-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project a6ec1e3d798f8eab43fb3a91028c6ab04e115fcb)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/8020d862c22d52b61a590343b2202e5d05332100
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Vishal-Verma/acpi-add-support-for-CXL-_OSC/20220317-082840
git checkout 8020d862c22d52b61a590343b2202e5d05332100
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/acpi/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c:562:3: warning: variable 'control' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
control |= OSC_CXL_ERROR_REPORTING_CONTROL;
^~~~~~~
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c:559:13: note: initialize the variable 'control' to silence this warning
u32 control;
^
= 0
>> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c:612:6: warning: variable 'cxl_support' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
if (is_cxl(root)) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c:619:22: note: uninitialized use occurs here
&cxl_control, cxl_support);
^~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c:612:2: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true
if (is_cxl(root)) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c:588:17: note: initialize the variable 'cxl_support' to silence this warning
u32 cxl_support, cxl_control = 0, cxl_requested = 0;
^
= 0
2 warnings generated.
vim +/control +562 drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
556
557 static u32 calculate_cxl_control(void)
558 {
559 u32 control;
560
561 if (pci_aer_available())
> 562 control |= OSC_CXL_ERROR_REPORTING_CONTROL;
563
564 return control;
565 }
566
567 static bool os_control_query_checks(struct acpi_pci_root *root, u32 support)
568 {
569 struct acpi_device *device = root->device;
570
571 if (pcie_ports_disabled) {
572 dev_info(&device->dev, "PCIe port services disabled; not requesting _OSC control\n");
573 return false;
574 }
575
576 if ((support & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) != ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
577 decode_osc_support(root, "not requesting OS control; OS requires",
578 ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT);
579 return false;
580 }
581
582 return true;
583 }
584
585 static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm)
586 {
587 u32 support, control = 0, requested = 0;
588 u32 cxl_support, cxl_control = 0, cxl_requested = 0;
589 acpi_status status;
590 struct acpi_device *device = root->device;
591 acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
592
593 /*
594 * Apple always return failure on _OSC calls when _OSI("Darwin") has
595 * been called successfully. We know the feature set supported by the
596 * platform, so avoid calling _OSC at all
597 */
598 if (x86_apple_machine) {
599 root->osc_control_set = ~OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
600 decode_osc_control(root, "OS assumes control of",
601 root->osc_control_set);
602 return;
603 }
604
605 support = calculate_support();
606
607 decode_osc_support(root, "OS supports", support);
608
609 if (os_control_query_checks(root, support))
610 requested = control = calculate_control();
611
> 612 if (is_cxl(root)) {
613 cxl_support = calculate_cxl_support();
614 decode_cxl_osc_support(root, "OS supports", cxl_support);
615 cxl_requested = cxl_control = calculate_cxl_control();
616 }
617
618 status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &control, support,
619 &cxl_control, cxl_support);
620 if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
621 if (control)
622 decode_osc_control(root, "OS now controls", control);
623 if (cxl_control)
624 decode_cxl_osc_control(root, "OS now controls",
625 cxl_control);
626
627 if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM) {
628 /*
629 * We have ASPM control, but the FADT indicates that
630 * it's unsupported. Leave existing configuration
631 * intact and prevent the OS from touching it.
632 */
633 dev_info(&device->dev, "FADT indicates ASPM is unsupported, using BIOS configuration\n");
634 *no_aspm = 1;
635 }
636 } else {
637 /*
638 * We want to disable ASPM here, but aspm_disabled
639 * needs to remain in its state from boot so that we
640 * properly handle PCIe 1.1 devices. So we set this
641 * flag here, to defer the action until after the ACPI
642 * root scan.
643 */
644 *no_aspm = 1;
645
646 /* _OSC is optional for PCI host bridges */
647 if ((status == AE_NOT_FOUND) && !is_pcie(root))
648 return;
649
650 if (control) {
651 decode_osc_control(root, "OS requested", requested);
652 decode_osc_control(root, "platform willing to grant", control);
653 }
654 if (cxl_control) {
655 decode_cxl_osc_control(root, "OS requested", cxl_requested);
656 decode_cxl_osc_control(root, "platform willing to grant",
657 cxl_control);
658 }
659
660 dev_info(&device->dev, "_OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (%s)\n",
661 acpi_format_exception(status));
662 }
663 }
664
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-17 3:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-17 0:27 [RFC PATCH 0/2] acpi: add support for CXL _OSC Vishal Verma
2022-03-17 0:27 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] PCI/ACPI: Use CXL _OSC instead of PCIe _OSC Vishal Verma
2022-03-17 1:47 ` Dan Williams
2022-03-17 15:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-17 0:27 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] acpi/pci_root: negotiate CXL _OSC Vishal Verma
2022-03-17 3:19 ` Dan Williams
2022-03-17 3:49 ` Verma, Vishal L
2022-03-17 3:25 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-03-17 16:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-18 21:16 ` Verma, Vishal L
2022-03-17 15:19 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] acpi: add support for " Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-18 19:52 ` Verma, Vishal L
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-17 5:48 [RFC PATCH 2/2] acpi/pci_root: negotiate " kernel test robot
2022-03-18 0:33 kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202203171123.Jy0945To-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.