All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	yishaih@nvidia.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vfio-pci: Provide reviewers and acceptance criteria for vendor drivers
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 16:41:33 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220317194133.GE11336@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220315102200.15a86b16.alex.williamson@redhat.com>

On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:22:00AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 12:53:04 -0300

> > I agree we should not use the vendor name
> > 
> > In general I wonder if this is a bit too specific to PCI, really this
> > is just review criteria for any driver making a struct vfio_device_ops
> > implementation, and we have some specific guidance for migration here
> > as well.
> > 
> > Like if IBM makes s390 migration drivers all of this applies just as
> > well even though they are not PCI.
> 
> Are you volunteering to be a reviewer under drivers/vfio/?  Careful,
> I'll add you ;)

Haha, sure you can do that if it helps

We still have a quite a ways to go before all the iommu features are
exposed and we get dirty tracking done.

Thanks,
Jason

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-17 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-14 20:24 [PATCH v3] vfio-pci: Provide reviewers and acceptance criteria for vendor drivers Alex Williamson
2022-03-15  2:14 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-15  7:23 ` Yishai Hadas
2022-03-15  9:26 ` Cornelia Huck
2022-03-15 15:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-15 16:22     ` Alex Williamson
2022-03-15 17:32       ` Cornelia Huck
2022-03-17 19:41       ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220317194133.GE11336@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.