From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@huawei.com>
Cc: willy@infradead.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
houtao1@huawei.com, fangwei1@huawei.com,
hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: fix an infinite loop in iomap_fiemap
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 15:05:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220317220511.GA8182@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220315065745.3441989-1-guoxuenan@huawei.com>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 02:57:45PM +0800, Guo Xuenan wrote:
> when get fiemap starting from MAX_LFS_FILESIZE, (maxbytes - *len) < start
> will always true , then *len set zero. because of start offset is byhond
> file size, for erofs filesystem it will always return iomap.length with
> zero,iomap iterate will be infinite loop.
>
> In order to avoid this situation, it is better to calculate the actual
> mapping length at first. If the len is 0, there is no need to continue
> the operation.
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 905 at fs/iomap/iter.c:35 iomap_iter+0x97f/0xc70
> Modules linked in: xfs erofs
> CPU: 7 PID: 905 Comm: iomap Tainted: G W 5.17.0-rc8 #27
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:iomap_iter+0x97f/0xc70
> Code: 85 a1 fc ff ff e8 71 be 9c ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 e9 92 fc ff ff e8 62 be 9c ff 0f 0b b8 fb ff ff ff e9 fc f8 ff ff e8 51 be 9c ff <0f> 0b e9 2b fc ff ff e8 45 be 9c ff 0f 0b e9 e1 fb ff ff e8 39 be
> RSP: 0018:ffff888060a37ab0 EFLAGS: 00010293
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888060a37bb0 RCX: 0000000000000000
> RDX: ffff88807e19a900 RSI: ffffffff81a7da7f RDI: ffff888060a37be0
> RBP: 7fffffffffffffff R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff888060a37c20
> R10: ffff888060a37c67 R11: ffffed100c146f8c R12: 7fffffffffffffff
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff888060a37bd8 R15: ffff888060a37c20
> FS: 00007fd3cca01540(0000) GS:ffff888108780000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 0000000020010820 CR3: 0000000054b92000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> iomap_fiemap+0x1c9/0x2f0
> erofs_fiemap+0x64/0x90 [erofs]
> do_vfs_ioctl+0x40d/0x12e0
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0xaa/0x1c0
> do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> </TASK>
> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7 stuck for 26s! [iomap:905]
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/ioctl.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ioctl.c b/fs/ioctl.c
> index 1ed097e94af2..7f70e90766ed 100644
> --- a/fs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/ioctl.c
> @@ -171,8 +171,6 @@ int fiemap_prep(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
> u32 incompat_flags;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (*len == 0)
> - return -EINVAL;
> if (start > maxbytes)
> return -EFBIG;
>
> @@ -182,6 +180,9 @@ int fiemap_prep(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
> if (*len > maxbytes || (maxbytes - *len) < start)
> *len = maxbytes - start;
>
> + if (*len == 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
Looks fine to me (and I don't even really mind pulling this in) but this
isn't a patch to fs/iomap/ -- doesn't the same issue potentially affect
the fiemap implementations that do not use iomap?
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> +
> supported_flags |= FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC;
> supported_flags &= FIEMAP_FLAGS_COMPAT;
> incompat_flags = fieinfo->fi_flags & ~supported_flags;
> --
> 2.22.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-17 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-15 6:57 [PATCH] iomap: fix an infinite loop in iomap_fiemap Guo Xuenan
2022-03-15 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-15 8:04 ` Gao Xiang
2022-03-15 8:59 ` Guo Xuenan
2022-03-17 22:05 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-03-18 7:21 ` Guo Xuenan
2022-03-20 16:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-03-29 3:29 ` [PATCH v2] fs: " Guo Xuenan
2022-03-29 6:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220317220511.GA8182@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fangwei1@huawei.com \
--cc=guoxuenan@huawei.com \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.