From: sj@kernel.org
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: sj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/damon: Make the sampling more accurate
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 10:49:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220318104948.26387-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5cb98e07-1e51-e376-8e67-dffc92f24941@linux.alibaba.com>
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:01:19 +0800 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/18/2022 5:40 PM, sj@kernel.org wrote:
> > Hi Baolin,
> >
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 17:23:13 +0800 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >
> >> When I try to sample the physical address with DAMON to migrate pages
> >> on tiered memory system, I found it will demote some cold regions mistakenly.
> >> Now we will choose an physical address in the region randomly, but if
> >> its corresponding page is not an online LRU page, we will ignore the
> >> accessing status in this cycle of sampling, and actually will be treated
> >> as a non-accessed region. Suppose a region including some non-LRU pages,
> >> it will be treated as a cold region with a high probability, and may be
> >> merged with adjacent cold regions, but there are some pages may be
> >> accessed we missed.
> >>
> >> So instead of ignoring the access status of this region if we did not find
> >> a valid page according to current sampling address, we can use last valid
> >> sampling address to help to make the sampling more accurate, then we can do
> >> a better decision.
> >
> > Well... Offlined pages are also a valid part of the memory region, so treating
> > those as not accessed and making the memory region containing the offlined
> > pages looks colder seems legal to me. IOW, this approach could make memory
> > regions containing many non-online-LRU pages as hot.
>
> IMO I don't think this is a problem, since if this region containing
> many non-online-LRU pages is treated as hot, which means threre are aome
> pages are hot, right? We can find them and promote them to fast memory
> (or do other schemes). Meanwhile, for non-online-LRU pages, we can
> filter them and do nothing for them, since we can not get a valid page
> struct for them.
For some of DAMOS actions that you mentioned, that could make sense. However,
that wouldn't make much sense for some other cases, especially for manual
DAMON-based access pattern profiling.
After all, we already have a mechanism for this case: adaptive regions
adjustment (or, regions split/merge). That mechanism will eventually separate
out hot oneline-LRU pages in the memory regions. Before the region is
adjusted, reporting the whole region as hot looks like a right result to me.
Of course, I admit that it could take too much time to converge to the optimal
regions, and there are many rooms for improvement of the regions adjustment
mechanism. I think we should pursue the direction (improving the regions
adjustment mechanism).
FYI, I have some rough ideas for improving the mechanism including partitioning
regions into more than 2 sub-regions if we belive it is not making a good
progress. Nevertheless, I'd like to first make a methodology for evaluating
current accuracy. For that, I am planning to implement a page-granularity
access monitoring.
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-18 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-18 9:23 [PATCH] mm/damon: Make the sampling more accurate Baolin Wang
2022-03-18 9:40 ` sj
2022-03-18 10:01 ` Baolin Wang
2022-03-18 10:49 ` sj [this message]
2022-03-18 11:58 ` Baolin Wang
2022-03-18 12:15 ` sj
2022-03-18 14:12 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220318104948.26387-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.