From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B63DC433EF for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 17:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1352189AbiCXRRA (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2022 13:17:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42232 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1352190AbiCXRQ4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2022 13:16:56 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B25B6B188F for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 66BAE68BFE; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 18:15:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 18:15:18 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jan Kara Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Josef Bacik , Minchan Kim , Nitin Gupta , Tetsuo Handa , "Darrick J . Wong" , Ming Lei , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, nbd@other.debian.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] loop: remove lo_refcount and avoid lo_mutex in ->open / ->release Message-ID: <20220324171518.GC28007@lst.de> References: <20220324075119.1556334-1-hch@lst.de> <20220324075119.1556334-13-hch@lst.de> <20220324141321.pqesnshaswwk3svk@quack3.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220324141321.pqesnshaswwk3svk@quack3.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 03:13:21PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > Looks good but I still think we need something like attached preparatory > patch to not regress e.g. filesystem probing triggered by udev events. What > do you think? Yes, I think it makes sense to add that.