[merged] ocfs2-cleanup-some-return-variables.patch removed from -mm tree

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

The patch titled
     Subject: ocfs2: cleanup some return variables
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     ocfs2-cleanup-some-return-variables.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: ocfs2: cleanup some return variables

Simply return directly instead of assign the return value to another
variable.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220114021641.13927-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Cc: CGEL ZTE <cgel.zte@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/ocfs2/file.c       |    9 +++------
 fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c |   18 ++++++------------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c~ocfs2-cleanup-some-return-variables
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
@@ -540,15 +540,12 @@ int ocfs2_add_inode_data(struct ocfs2_su
 			 struct ocfs2_alloc_context *meta_ac,
 			 enum ocfs2_alloc_restarted *reason_ret)
 {
-	int ret;
 	struct ocfs2_extent_tree et;
 
 	ocfs2_init_dinode_extent_tree(&et, INODE_CACHE(inode), fe_bh);
-	ret = ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree(handle, &et, logical_offset,
-					  clusters_to_add, mark_unwritten,
-					  data_ac, meta_ac, reason_ret);
-
-	return ret;
+	return ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree(handle, &et, logical_offset,
+					   clusters_to_add, mark_unwritten,
+					   data_ac, meta_ac, reason_ret);
 }
 
 static int ocfs2_extend_allocation(struct inode *inode, u32 logical_start,
--- a/fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c~ocfs2-cleanup-some-return-variables
+++ a/fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c
@@ -683,28 +683,22 @@ static int user_dlm_lock(struct ocfs2_cl
 			 void *name,
 			 unsigned int namelen)
 {
-	int ret;
-
 	if (!lksb->lksb_fsdlm.sb_lvbptr)
 		lksb->lksb_fsdlm.sb_lvbptr = (char *)lksb +
 					     sizeof(struct dlm_lksb);
 
-	ret = dlm_lock(conn->cc_lockspace, mode, &lksb->lksb_fsdlm,
-		       flags|DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT, name, namelen, 0,
-		       fsdlm_lock_ast_wrapper, lksb,
-		       fsdlm_blocking_ast_wrapper);
-	return ret;
+	return dlm_lock(conn->cc_lockspace, mode, &lksb->lksb_fsdlm,
+			flags|DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT, name, namelen, 0,
+			fsdlm_lock_ast_wrapper, lksb,
+			fsdlm_blocking_ast_wrapper);
 }
 
 static int user_dlm_unlock(struct ocfs2_cluster_connection *conn,
 			   struct ocfs2_dlm_lksb *lksb,
 			   u32 flags)
 {
-	int ret;
-
-	ret = dlm_unlock(conn->cc_lockspace, lksb->lksb_fsdlm.sb_lkid,
-			 flags, &lksb->lksb_fsdlm, lksb);
-	return ret;
+	return dlm_unlock(conn->cc_lockspace, lksb->lksb_fsdlm.sb_lkid,
+			  flags, &lksb->lksb_fsdlm, lksb);
 }
 
 static int user_dlm_lock_status(struct ocfs2_dlm_lksb *lksb)
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com are