All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, sashal@kernel.org,
	mike.kravetz@oracle.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
	hughd@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged] mm-unmap_mapping_range_tree-with-i_mmap_rwsem-shared.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:43:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220325224320.7C83EC004DD@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: mm: unmap_mapping_range_tree() with i_mmap_rwsem shared
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-unmap_mapping_range_tree-with-i_mmap_rwsem-shared.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: mm: unmap_mapping_range_tree() with i_mmap_rwsem shared

Revert 48ec833b7851 ("Revert "mm/memory.c: share the i_mmap_rwsem"") to
reinstate c8475d144abb ("mm/memory.c: share the i_mmap_rwsem"): the
unmap_mapping_range family of functions do the unmapping of user pages
(ultimately via zap_page_range_single) without modifying the interval tree
itself, and unmapping races are necessarily guarded by page table lock,
thus the i_mmap_rwsem should be shared in unmap_mapping_pages() and
unmap_mapping_folio().

Commit 48ec833b7851 was intended as a short-term measure, allowing the
other shared lock changes into 3.19 final, before investigating three
trinity crashes, one of which had been bisected to commit c8475d144ab:

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/14/342
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5466142C.60100@oracle.com/
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/22/213
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/549832E2.8060609@oracle.com/
[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/9/741
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5487ACC5.1010002@oracle.com/

Two of those were Bad page states: free_pages_prepare() found PG_mlocked
still set - almost certain to have been fixed by 4.4 commit b87537d9e2fe
("mm: rmap use pte lock not mmap_sem to set PageMlocked").  The NULL deref
on rwsem in [2]: unclear, only happened once, not bisected to c8475d144ab.

No change to the i_mmap_lock_write() around __unmap_hugepage_range_final()
in unmap_single_vma(): IIRC that's a special usage, helping to serialize
hugetlbfs page table sharing, not to be dabbled with lightly.  No change
to other uses of i_mmap_lock_write() by hugetlbfs.

I am not aware of any significant gains from the concurrency allowed by
this commit: it is submitted more to resolve an ancient misunderstanding.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/e4a5e356-6c87-47b2-3ce8-c2a95ae84e20@google.com
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/memory.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memory.c~mm-unmap_mapping_range_tree-with-i_mmap_rwsem-shared
+++ a/mm/memory.c
@@ -3388,11 +3388,11 @@ void unmap_mapping_folio(struct folio *f
 	details.even_cows = false;
 	details.single_folio = folio;
 
-	i_mmap_lock_write(mapping);
+	i_mmap_lock_read(mapping);
 	if (unlikely(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&mapping->i_mmap.rb_root)))
 		unmap_mapping_range_tree(&mapping->i_mmap, first_index,
 					 last_index, &details);
-	i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping);
+	i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -3418,11 +3418,11 @@ void unmap_mapping_pages(struct address_
 	if (last_index < first_index)
 		last_index = ULONG_MAX;
 
-	i_mmap_lock_write(mapping);
+	i_mmap_lock_read(mapping);
 	if (unlikely(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&mapping->i_mmap.rb_root)))
 		unmap_mapping_range_tree(&mapping->i_mmap, first_index,
 					 last_index, &details);
-	i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping);
+	i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unmap_mapping_pages);
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from hughd@google.com are



                 reply	other threads:[~2022-03-25 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220325224320.7C83EC004DD@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.