All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Shlomo Pongratz <shlomopongratz@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	andrew.maier@eideticom.com, logang@deltatee.com,
	bhelgaas@google.com, Shlomo Pongratz <shlomop@pliops.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/1] Intel Sky Lake-E host root ports check.
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:11:45 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220330191145.GE2120790@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220330191017.GA1700536@bhelgaas>

On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 02:10:17PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 12:37:20PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 05:08:23PM +0300, Shlomo Pongratz wrote:
> > > @@ -350,7 +353,10 @@ static struct pci_dev *pci_host_bridge_dev(struct pci_host_bridge *host)
> > >  
> > >  	if (!root)
> > >  		return NULL;
> > > -	if (root->devfn != PCI_DEVFN(0, 0))
> > > +
> > > +	/* Is it a host bridge or a root port? */
> > 
> > This is a better comment:
> > 
> > /* host bridges must have a 0 devfn, but some of the entries in the
> >   whilelist are root ports that can have any devfn */
> 
> Is this something in the spec or is it just common practice?  The PCIe
> spec says very little about "host bridges" and I don't remember
> anything about them having to be devfn 0 or even that they have to be
> materialized as PCI devices.

I think we are relying on common practice here, but I don't know why
this check was added in the first place? Logan?

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-30 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-30 14:08 [PATCH V4 0/1] Intel Sky Lake-E host root ports check Shlomo Pongratz
2022-03-30 14:08 ` [PATCH V4 1/1] " Shlomo Pongratz
2022-03-30 15:20   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-03-30 15:37   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-30 19:10     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-03-30 19:11       ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-03-30 19:36         ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-03-30 19:38           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-30 19:46             ` Logan Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220330191145.GE2120790@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=andrew.maier@eideticom.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=shlomop@pliops.com \
    --cc=shlomopongratz@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.