From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB78C4332F for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:28:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C564B219; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 10:28:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@kernel.org Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a6soksbOdlbG; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 10:28:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE9B4A10E; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 10:28:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9635F4B120 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 10:28:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ES1pMaVX6RLF for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 10:28:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 685A84B134 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 10:28:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83394B82502; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F062C340EE; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:28:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1648823315; bh=++ZMjef2Bu+3ZlLA/4YbvSkJqgM7tr0bCiofyxAxu8Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jp0m5nTO1U+2u9ZJ07IAEPjWzh3wjvqNZ0nFwqZuJOKUiNbgMZV/xQkFApUZJN3Jy 4Fogs7FX0sR8e5O2rvw/rMjGgbXskJwa3hWhY80ETpz97BxO7r7Yl2jkWQ7t0eZf9t 5vs6AnLAgQaC0ZgtZaF+lqB7OiH2CnbvOolL2h4Ek7gEvJLLEB/+5pfCvpyhLnV13k nm6EMsPtDP3ccKczTvMFIVPtmWDgf0bXTUYPLhTHTODVVQQNRRGUKUPEm7c2FmZpuF MwwndBcPm5nJhtdavdPERFEoaCzNavcMZiWDSdJ+N3sO9enGbt8FNtqge4ioY2WenG j0gaMtPXUh1Tg== From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.17 054/149] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix the failure check in kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 10:24:01 -0400 Message-Id: <20220401142536.1948161-54-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20220401142536.1948161-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20220401142536.1948161-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Cc: Sasha Levin , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu From: Ricardo Koller [ Upstream commit 5b7898648f02083012900e48d063e51ccbdad165 ] kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check(expect_failure=true) is used to check the error code returned by the kernel when trying to setup an invalid gsi routing table. The ioctl fails if "pin >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS", so kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check() should test the error only when "intid >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS+32". The issue is that the test check is "intid >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS", so for a case like "intid = KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS" the test wrongly assumes that the kernel will return an error. Fix this by using the right check. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller Reported-by: Reiji Watanabe Cc: Andrew Jones Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127030858.3269036-4-ricarkol@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c index 7f3afee5cc00..48e43e24d240 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c @@ -573,8 +573,8 @@ static void kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check(struct kvm_vm *vm, kvm_gsi_routing_write(vm, routing); } else { ret = _kvm_gsi_routing_write(vm, routing); - /* The kernel only checks for KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS. */ - if (intid >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS) + /* The kernel only checks e->irqchip.pin >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS */ + if (((uint64_t)intid + num - 1 - MIN_SPI) >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS) TEST_ASSERT(ret != 0 && errno == EINVAL, "Bad intid %u did not cause KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING " "error: rc: %i errno: %i", intid, ret, errno); -- 2.34.1 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04301C433F5 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:33:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347335AbiDAOe6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2022 10:34:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38240 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1347389AbiDAOcW (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2022 10:32:22 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9711957B20; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 07:28:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28E8AB8250F; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F062C340EE; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:28:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1648823315; bh=++ZMjef2Bu+3ZlLA/4YbvSkJqgM7tr0bCiofyxAxu8Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jp0m5nTO1U+2u9ZJ07IAEPjWzh3wjvqNZ0nFwqZuJOKUiNbgMZV/xQkFApUZJN3Jy 4Fogs7FX0sR8e5O2rvw/rMjGgbXskJwa3hWhY80ETpz97BxO7r7Yl2jkWQ7t0eZf9t 5vs6AnLAgQaC0ZgtZaF+lqB7OiH2CnbvOolL2h4Ek7gEvJLLEB/+5pfCvpyhLnV13k nm6EMsPtDP3ccKczTvMFIVPtmWDgf0bXTUYPLhTHTODVVQQNRRGUKUPEm7c2FmZpuF MwwndBcPm5nJhtdavdPERFEoaCzNavcMZiWDSdJ+N3sO9enGbt8FNtqge4ioY2WenG j0gaMtPXUh1Tg== From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ricardo Koller , Reiji Watanabe , Andrew Jones , Marc Zyngier , Sasha Levin , pbonzini@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.17 054/149] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix the failure check in kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 10:24:01 -0400 Message-Id: <20220401142536.1948161-54-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20220401142536.1948161-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20220401142536.1948161-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org From: Ricardo Koller [ Upstream commit 5b7898648f02083012900e48d063e51ccbdad165 ] kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check(expect_failure=true) is used to check the error code returned by the kernel when trying to setup an invalid gsi routing table. The ioctl fails if "pin >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS", so kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check() should test the error only when "intid >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS+32". The issue is that the test check is "intid >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS", so for a case like "intid = KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS" the test wrongly assumes that the kernel will return an error. Fix this by using the right check. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller Reported-by: Reiji Watanabe Cc: Andrew Jones Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127030858.3269036-4-ricarkol@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c index 7f3afee5cc00..48e43e24d240 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c @@ -573,8 +573,8 @@ static void kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check(struct kvm_vm *vm, kvm_gsi_routing_write(vm, routing); } else { ret = _kvm_gsi_routing_write(vm, routing); - /* The kernel only checks for KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS. */ - if (intid >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS) + /* The kernel only checks e->irqchip.pin >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS */ + if (((uint64_t)intid + num - 1 - MIN_SPI) >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS) TEST_ASSERT(ret != 0 && errno == EINVAL, "Bad intid %u did not cause KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING " "error: rc: %i errno: %i", intid, ret, errno); -- 2.34.1 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0373C433F5 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:30:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=vmf2ADHn9NusfjflWGC2Rpbs8jXl2y6TQ8/ZXreZQFk=; b=CrhP4/jYGmdFxr sMHH0rVyvO5fes+8gYgkCz5ZVQ7mhdYwwVPBPflSbdHteFnV6kfXds8K7nMMzWMgiLHmIzOY0Kwo1 jDnuTlwRHdiNmA4tqEBh0HglcvqUmOshUtJ4IVaypVF8IB6uA18pES3f2rPmHkTMbtpTY1cMgu+Aa bugCE9Yr8816fzIwcRMdhAPmahSvngncVHYLJh589aGsP9muKLJzPeYzB4sChtlYmR5QVcEkr909q No1G70hMzXhQMIyXTfgQslQlzJU2sf2csxUI9NhVsNAxPrhZna6DSHXcswNM06R3hLF+iM7IFHq9a ux+XJHkRK5oO544tcMtQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1naIHC-0061hG-To; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 14:29:23 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1naIGU-0061DF-2a for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 14:28:41 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83394B82502; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F062C340EE; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:28:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1648823315; bh=++ZMjef2Bu+3ZlLA/4YbvSkJqgM7tr0bCiofyxAxu8Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jp0m5nTO1U+2u9ZJ07IAEPjWzh3wjvqNZ0nFwqZuJOKUiNbgMZV/xQkFApUZJN3Jy 4Fogs7FX0sR8e5O2rvw/rMjGgbXskJwa3hWhY80ETpz97BxO7r7Yl2jkWQ7t0eZf9t 5vs6AnLAgQaC0ZgtZaF+lqB7OiH2CnbvOolL2h4Ek7gEvJLLEB/+5pfCvpyhLnV13k nm6EMsPtDP3ccKczTvMFIVPtmWDgf0bXTUYPLhTHTODVVQQNRRGUKUPEm7c2FmZpuF MwwndBcPm5nJhtdavdPERFEoaCzNavcMZiWDSdJ+N3sO9enGbt8FNtqge4ioY2WenG j0gaMtPXUh1Tg== From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ricardo Koller , Reiji Watanabe , Andrew Jones , Marc Zyngier , Sasha Levin , pbonzini@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.17 054/149] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix the failure check in kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 10:24:01 -0400 Message-Id: <20220401142536.1948161-54-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20220401142536.1948161-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20220401142536.1948161-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220401_072838_327697_EF5FE391 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.52 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Ricardo Koller [ Upstream commit 5b7898648f02083012900e48d063e51ccbdad165 ] kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check(expect_failure=true) is used to check the error code returned by the kernel when trying to setup an invalid gsi routing table. The ioctl fails if "pin >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS", so kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check() should test the error only when "intid >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS+32". The issue is that the test check is "intid >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS", so for a case like "intid = KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS" the test wrongly assumes that the kernel will return an error. Fix this by using the right check. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller Reported-by: Reiji Watanabe Cc: Andrew Jones Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127030858.3269036-4-ricarkol@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c index 7f3afee5cc00..48e43e24d240 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c @@ -573,8 +573,8 @@ static void kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check(struct kvm_vm *vm, kvm_gsi_routing_write(vm, routing); } else { ret = _kvm_gsi_routing_write(vm, routing); - /* The kernel only checks for KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS. */ - if (intid >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS) + /* The kernel only checks e->irqchip.pin >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS */ + if (((uint64_t)intid + num - 1 - MIN_SPI) >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS) TEST_ASSERT(ret != 0 && errno == EINVAL, "Bad intid %u did not cause KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING " "error: rc: %i errno: %i", intid, ret, errno); -- 2.34.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel