From: Sevinj Aghayeva <sevinj.aghayeva@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
outreachy@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: r8188eu: simplify control flow
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 22:46:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220404024615.GA410484@euclid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220403164250.GA371601@euclid>
My apologies for forgetting to Cc the maintainers! Added them now.
On Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 12:42:50PM -0400, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote:
> The function iterates an index from 0 to NUM_PMKID_CACHE and returns
> the first index for which the condition is true. If no such index is
> found, the function returns -1. Current code has a complex control
> flow that obfuscates this simple task. Replace it with a loop.
>
> Also, given the shortened function body, replace the long variable
> name psecuritypriv with a short variable name p.
>
> Reported by checkpatch:
>
> WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
>
> Signed-off-by: Sevinj Aghayeva <sevinj.aghayeva@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> v1 -> v2: Put the conditional in a single line to avoid checkpatch
> complaint.
>
> drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c | 25 ++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> index f94b1536a177..cddd8ab80236 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> @@ -1637,26 +1637,13 @@ int rtw_restruct_wmm_ie(struct adapter *adapter, u8 *in_ie, u8 *out_ie, uint in_
>
> static int SecIsInPMKIDList(struct adapter *Adapter, u8 *bssid)
> {
> - struct security_priv *psecuritypriv = &Adapter->securitypriv;
> - int i = 0;
> -
> - do {
> - if ((psecuritypriv->PMKIDList[i].bUsed) &&
> - (!memcmp(psecuritypriv->PMKIDList[i].Bssid, bssid, ETH_ALEN))) {
> - break;
> - } else {
> - i++;
> - /* continue; */
> - }
> -
> - } while (i < NUM_PMKID_CACHE);
> + struct security_priv *p = &Adapter->securitypriv;
> + int i;
>
> - if (i == NUM_PMKID_CACHE) {
> - i = -1;/* Could not find. */
> - } else {
> - /* There is one Pre-Authentication Key for the specific BSSID. */
> - }
> - return i;
> + for (i = 0; i < NUM_PMKID_CACHE; i++)
> + if (p->PMKIDList[i].bUsed && !memcmp(p->PMKIDList[i].Bssid, bssid, ETH_ALEN))
> + return i;
> + return -1;
> }
>
> /* */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-04 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-03 16:42 [PATCH v2] staging: r8188eu: simplify control flow Sevinj Aghayeva
2022-04-04 2:46 ` Sevinj Aghayeva [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220404024615.GA410484@euclid \
--to=sevinj.aghayeva@gmail.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=outreachy@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.