All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: "Kalle Valo" <kvalo@kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.18] ath9k: Save rate counts before clearing tx status area
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 18:11:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220404181118.515b60ad@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220402122752.2347797-1-toke@toke.dk>

Hello Toke,

On Sat,  2 Apr 2022 14:27:51 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:

> From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
> 
> The ieee80211_tx_info_clear_status() helper also clears the rate counts, so
> we should restore them after clearing. However, we can get rid of the
> existing clearing of the counts of invalid rates. Rearrange the code a bit
> so the order fits the indexes, and so the setting of the count to
> hw->max_rate_tries on underrun is not immediately overridden.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
> Fixes: 037250f0a45c ("ath9k: Properly clear TX status area before reporting to mac80211")
> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c
> index cbcf96ac303e..ac7efecff29c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c
> @@ -2551,16 +2551,19 @@ static void ath_tx_rc_status(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ath_buf *bf,
>  	struct ieee80211_tx_info *tx_info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
>  	struct ieee80211_hw *hw = sc->hw;
>  	struct ath_hw *ah = sc->sc_ah;
> -	u8 i, tx_rateindex;
> +	u8 i, tx_rateindex, tries[IEEE80211_TX_MAX_RATES];
> +
> +	tx_rateindex = ts->ts_rateindex;
> +	WARN_ON(tx_rateindex >= hw->max_rates);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < tx_rateindex; i++)
> +		tries[i] = tx_info->status.rates[i].count;
>  
>  	ieee80211_tx_info_clear_status(tx_info);
>  
>  	if (txok)
>  		tx_info->status.ack_signal = ts->ts_rssi;
>  
> -	tx_rateindex = ts->ts_rateindex;
> -	WARN_ON(tx_rateindex >= hw->max_rates);
> -
>  	if (tx_info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU) {
>  		tx_info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU;
>  
> @@ -2569,6 +2572,14 @@ static void ath_tx_rc_status(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ath_buf *bf,
>  	tx_info->status.ampdu_len = nframes;
>  	tx_info->status.ampdu_ack_len = nframes - nbad;
>  
> +	for (i = 0; i < tx_rateindex; i++)
> +		tx_info->status.rates[i].count = tries[i];
> +
> +	tx_info->status.rates[tx_rateindex].count = ts->ts_longretry + 1;
> +
> +	for (i = tx_rateindex + 1; i < hw->max_rates; i++)
> +		tx_info->status.rates[i].idx = -1;
> +
>  	if ((ts->ts_status & ATH9K_TXERR_FILT) == 0 &&
>  	    (tx_info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_NO_ACK) == 0) {
>  		/*
> @@ -2591,12 +2602,6 @@ static void ath_tx_rc_status(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ath_buf *bf,
>  				hw->max_rate_tries;
>  	}

The full lines above read:

2597                 if (unlikely(ts->ts_flags & (ATH9K_TX_DATA_UNDERRUN |
2598                                              ATH9K_TX_DELIM_UNDERRUN)) &&
2599                     ieee80211_is_data(hdr->frame_control) && 
2600                     ah->tx_trig_level >= sc->sc_ah->config.max_txtrig_level     )
2601                         tx_info->status.rates[tx_rateindex].count =
2602                                 hw->max_rate_tries;
2603         }

So this patch fixes by drive-by a overwrite of tx_info->status.rates[tx_rateindex].count...

>  
> -	for (i = tx_rateindex + 1; i < hw->max_rates; i++) {
> -		tx_info->status.rates[i].count = 0;
> -		tx_info->status.rates[i].idx = -1;
> -	}
> -
> -	tx_info->status.rates[tx_rateindex].count = ts->ts_longretry + 1;
>  }
>  
>  static void ath_tx_processq(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ath_txq *txq)

Otherwise looks good ;-), would like to give a Reviewed-by/Tested-by but still
affected by the underlying ieee80211_tx_info status vs. rate_driver_data overwrite
as mentioned in the other thread (see [1])...

Regards,
Peter


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20220404130453.5ec6e045@gmx.net/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-04 21:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-02 12:27 [PATCH v5.18] ath9k: Save rate counts before clearing tx status area Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-04-02 12:31 ` Johannes Berg
2022-04-02 13:15   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-04-02 17:45     ` Kalle Valo
2022-04-03 13:23       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-04-02 12:40 ` Greg KH
2022-04-02 13:14   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-04-02 13:43     ` Greg KH
2022-04-04 16:11 ` Peter Seiderer [this message]
2022-04-04 17:27   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220404181118.515b60ad@gmx.net \
    --to=ps.report@gmx.net \
    --cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=toke@toke.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.