Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/2] net: tc: dsa: Implement offload of matchall for bridged DSA ports

[Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>]

On Wed, 6 Apr 2022 11:24:46 +0200 Mattias Forsblad wrote:
> On 2022-04-06 03:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon,  4 Apr 2022 12:48:24 +0200 Mattias Forsblad wrote:  
> >> Limitations
> >> If there is tc rules on a bridge and all the ports leave the bridge
> >> and then joins the bridge again, the indirect framwork doesn't seem
> >> to reoffload them at join. The tc rules need to be torn down and
> >> re-added.  
> > 
> > You should unregister your callback when last DSA port leaves and
> > re-register when first joins. That way you'll get replay.
> >   
> 
> So I've tried that and it partially works. I get the FLOW_BLOCK_BIND
> callback but tcf_action_reoffload_cb() bails out here (tc_act_bind() == 1):
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/net/sched/act_api.c?h=v5.18-rc1#n1819
> 
> B.c. that flag is set here:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/net/sched/cls_api.c?h=v5.18-rc1#n3088
> 
> I cannot say I fully understand this logic. Can you perhaps advise?

tcf_action_reoffload_cb() is for action-as-first-class-citizen offload.
I think you should get the reply thru tcf_block_playback_offloads().
But I haven't really kept up with the TC offloads, non-zero chance
they got broken :/

> > Also the code needs to check the matchall is highest prio.  
> 
> Isn't sufficient with this check?
> 
> 	else if (flow_offload_has_one_action(&cls->rule->action) &&
> 		 cls->rule->action.entries[0].id == FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
> 		err = dsa_slave_add_cls_matchall_drop(dev, cls, ingress);
> 
> If it only has one action is must be the highest priority or am I 
> missing something?

That just checks there is a single action on the rule.
There could be multiple rules, adding something like:

	if (flow->common.prio != 1)
		goto bail;

is what I had in mind.