All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, mingo@redhat.com,
	khalid.aziz@oracle.com, hch@infradead.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-mmap-add-new-config-arch_has_vm_get_page_prot.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 16:26:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220407232644.0ECB2C385A4@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: mm/mmap: add new config ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-mmap-add-new-config-arch_has_vm_get_page_prot.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-mmap-add-new-config-arch_has_vm_get_page_prot.patch
and later at
    https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-mmap-add-new-config-arch_has_vm_get_page_prot.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Subject: mm/mmap: add new config ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT

Patch series "mm/mmap: Drop arch_vm_get_page_prot() and arch_filter_pgprot()", v4.

protection_map[] is an array based construct that translates given
vm_flags combination.  This array contains page protection map, which is
populated by the platform via [__S000 ..  __S111] and [__P000 ..  __P111]
exported macros.  Primary usage for protection_map[] is for
vm_get_page_prot(), which is used to determine page protection value for a
given vm_flags.  vm_get_page_prot() implementation, could again call
platform overrides arch_vm_get_page_prot() and arch_filter_pgprot().  Some
platforms override protection_map[] that was originally built with
__SXXX/__PXXX with different runtime values.

Currently there are multiple layers of abstraction i.e __SXXX/__PXXX
macros, protection_map[], arch_vm_get_page_prot() and arch_filter_pgprot()
built between the platform and generic MM, finally defining
vm_get_page_prot().

Hence this series proposes to drop later two abstraction levels and
instead just move the responsibility of defining vm_get_page_prot() to the
platform (still utilizing generic protection_map[] array) itself making it
clean and simple.

This first introduces ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT which enables the
platforms to define custom vm_get_page_prot().  This starts converting
platforms that define the overrides arch_filter_pgprot() or
arch_vm_get_page_prot() which enables for those constructs to be dropped
off completely.

The series has been inspired from an earlier discuss with Christoph Hellwig

https://lore.kernel.org/all/1632712920-8171-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/


This patch (of 7):

Add a new config ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT, which when subscribed enables
a given platform to define its own vm_get_page_prot() but still utilizing
the generic protection_map[] array.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220407103251.1209606-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220407103251.1209606-2-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/Kconfig |    3 +++
 mm/mmap.c  |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

--- a/mm/Kconfig~mm-mmap-add-new-config-arch_has_vm_get_page_prot
+++ a/mm/Kconfig
@@ -765,6 +765,9 @@ config ARCH_HAS_CURRENT_STACK_POINTER
 config ARCH_HAS_FILTER_PGPROT
 	bool
 
+config ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT
+	bool
+
 config ARCH_HAS_PTE_DEVMAP
 	bool
 
--- a/mm/mmap.c~mm-mmap-add-new-config-arch_has_vm_get_page_prot
+++ a/mm/mmap.c
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ pgprot_t protection_map[16] __ro_after_i
 	[VM_SHARED | VM_EXEC | VM_WRITE | VM_READ]	= __S111
 };
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT
 #ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_FILTER_PGPROT
 static inline pgprot_t arch_filter_pgprot(pgprot_t prot)
 {
@@ -136,6 +137,7 @@ pgprot_t vm_get_page_prot(unsigned long
 	return arch_filter_pgprot(ret);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_get_page_prot);
+#endif	/* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT */
 
 static pgprot_t vm_pgprot_modify(pgprot_t oldprot, unsigned long vm_flags)
 {
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from anshuman.khandual@arm.com are

mm-debug_vm_pgtable-drop-protection_map-usage.patch
mm-mmap-clarify-protection_map-indices.patch
mm-mmap-add-new-config-arch_has_vm_get_page_prot.patch
powerpc-mm-enable-arch_has_vm_get_page_prot.patch
arm64-mm-enable-arch_has_vm_get_page_prot.patch
sparc-mm-enable-arch_has_vm_get_page_prot.patch
mm-mmap-drop-arch_filter_pgprot.patch
mm-mmap-drop-arch_vm_get_page_pgprot.patch


             reply	other threads:[~2022-04-07 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-07 23:26 Andrew Morton [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-04-14 21:10 + mm-mmap-add-new-config-arch_has_vm_get_page_prot.patch added to -mm tree Andrew Morton
2022-02-22  3:12 Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220407232644.0ECB2C385A4@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=khalid.aziz@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.