All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
To: Alexey Bayduraev <alexey.bayduraev@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Alexey Bayduraev <alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] perf cpumap: Switch to using perf_cpu_map API
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 23:21:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220412062133.2546080-2-irogers@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220412062133.2546080-1-irogers@google.com>

Switch some raw accesses to the cpu map to using the library API. This
can help with reference count checking.

Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-record.c          | 13 ++++++------
 tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c | 31 ++++++++++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
index 069825c48d40..a5cf6a99d67f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ static int record__thread_data_init_maps(struct record_thread *thread_data, stru
 
 	for (m = 0, tm = 0; m < nr_mmaps && tm < thread_data->nr_mmaps; m++) {
 		if (cpu_map__is_dummy(cpus) ||
-		    test_bit(cpus->map[m].cpu, thread_data->mask->maps.bits)) {
+		    test_bit(perf_cpu_map__cpu(cpus, m).cpu, thread_data->mask->maps.bits)) {
 			if (thread_data->maps) {
 				thread_data->maps[tm] = &mmap[m];
 				pr_debug2("thread_data[%p]: cpu%d: maps[%d] -> mmap[%d]\n",
@@ -3331,13 +3331,14 @@ struct option *record_options = __record_options;
 
 static void record__mmap_cpu_mask_init(struct mmap_cpu_mask *mask, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus)
 {
-	int c;
+	struct perf_cpu cpu;
+	int idx;
 
 	if (cpu_map__is_dummy(cpus))
 		return;
 
-	for (c = 0; c < cpus->nr; c++)
-		set_bit(cpus->map[c].cpu, mask->bits);
+	perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu(cpu, idx, cpus)
+		set_bit(cpu.cpu, mask->bits);
 }
 
 static int record__mmap_cpu_mask_init_spec(struct mmap_cpu_mask *mask, const char *mask_spec)
@@ -3404,8 +3405,8 @@ static int record__init_thread_cpu_masks(struct record *rec, struct perf_cpu_map
 	pr_debug("nr_threads: %d\n", rec->nr_threads);
 
 	for (t = 0; t < rec->nr_threads; t++) {
-		set_bit(cpus->map[t].cpu, rec->thread_masks[t].maps.bits);
-		set_bit(cpus->map[t].cpu, rec->thread_masks[t].affinity.bits);
+		set_bit(perf_cpu_map__cpu(cpus, t).cpu, rec->thread_masks[t].maps.bits);
+		set_bit(perf_cpu_map__cpu(cpus, t).cpu, rec->thread_masks[t].affinity.bits);
 		if (verbose) {
 			pr_debug("thread_masks[%d]: ", t);
 			mmap_cpu_mask__scnprintf(&rec->thread_masks[t].maps, "maps");
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c
index ac60c08e8e2a..a4b676920da0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static int bperf_load_program(struct evlist *evlist)
 	struct evsel *evsel;
 	struct cgroup *cgrp, *leader_cgrp;
 	__u32 i, cpu;
-	__u32 nr_cpus = evlist->core.all_cpus->nr;
+	__u32 nr_cpus = perf_cpu_map__nr(evlist->core.all_cpus);
 	int total_cpus = cpu__max_cpu().cpu;
 	int map_size, map_fd;
 	int prog_fd, err;
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int bperf_load_program(struct evlist *evlist)
 			for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++) {
 				int fd = FD(evsel, cpu);
 				__u32 idx = evsel->core.idx * total_cpus +
-					evlist->core.all_cpus->map[cpu].cpu;
+					perf_cpu_map__cpu(evlist->core.all_cpus, cpu).cpu;
 
 				err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &idx, &fd,
 							  BPF_ANY);
@@ -207,13 +207,13 @@ static int bperf_cgrp__install_pe(struct evsel *evsel __maybe_unused,
  */
 static int bperf_cgrp__sync_counters(struct evlist *evlist)
 {
-	int i, cpu;
-	int nr_cpus = evlist->core.all_cpus->nr;
+	struct perf_cpu cpu;
+	int idx;
 	int prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.trigger_read);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
-		cpu = evlist->core.all_cpus->map[i].cpu;
-		bperf_trigger_reading(prog_fd, cpu);
+	perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu(cpu, idx, cpus) {
+		cpu = perf_cpu_map__cpu(evlist->core.all_cpus, i);
+		bperf_trigger_reading(prog_fd, cpu.cpu);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -244,12 +244,10 @@ static int bperf_cgrp__disable(struct evsel *evsel)
 static int bperf_cgrp__read(struct evsel *evsel)
 {
 	struct evlist *evlist = evsel->evlist;
-	int i, cpu, nr_cpus = evlist->core.all_cpus->nr;
 	int total_cpus = cpu__max_cpu().cpu;
 	struct perf_counts_values *counts;
 	struct bpf_perf_event_value *values;
 	int reading_map_fd, err = 0;
-	__u32 idx;
 
 	if (evsel->core.idx)
 		return 0;
@@ -263,7 +261,10 @@ static int bperf_cgrp__read(struct evsel *evsel)
 	reading_map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.cgrp_readings);
 
 	evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, evsel) {
-		idx = evsel->core.idx;
+		__u32 idx = evsel->core.idx;
+		int i;
+		struct perf_cpu_map cpu;
+
 		err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(reading_map_fd, &idx, values);
 		if (err) {
 			pr_err("bpf map lookup failed: idx=%u, event=%s, cgrp=%s\n",
@@ -271,13 +272,11 @@ static int bperf_cgrp__read(struct evsel *evsel)
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
-			cpu = evlist->core.all_cpus->map[i].cpu;
-
+		perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu(cpu, i, evlist->core.all_cpu) {
 			counts = perf_counts(evsel->counts, i, 0);
-			counts->val = values[cpu].counter;
-			counts->ena = values[cpu].enabled;
-			counts->run = values[cpu].running;
+			counts->val = values[cpu.cpu].counter;
+			counts->ena = values[cpu.cpu].enabled;
+			counts->run = values[cpu.cpu].running;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.35.1.1178.g4f1659d476-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-12  6:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-12  6:21 [PATCH 1/3] perf record: Fix per-thread option Ian Rogers
2022-04-12  6:21 ` Ian Rogers [this message]
2022-04-12  6:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf test: Add basic perf record tests Ian Rogers
2022-04-13 20:13   ` Namhyung Kim
2022-04-13  1:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf record: Fix per-thread option Alexey Bayduraev
2022-04-14  1:31   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220412062133.2546080-2-irogers@google.com \
    --to=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexey.bayduraev@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rickyman7@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.