[PATCH 2/2] acpi/nvdimm: Fix aml_or() and aml_and() in if clause

[Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>]

It should be some typo originally, where in If condition, using bitwise
and/or, rather than logical and/or.

The resulting change in AML code:

If (((Local6 == Zero) | (Arg0 != Local0)))
==>
If (((Local6 == Zero) || (Arg0 != Local0)))

If (((ObjectType (Arg3) == 0x04) & (SizeOf (Arg3) == One)))
==>
If (((ObjectType (Arg3) == 0x04) && (SizeOf (Arg3) == One)))

Fixes: 90623ebf603 ("nvdimm acpi: check UUID")
Fixes: 4568c948066 ("nvdimm acpi: save arg3 of _DSM method")
Signed-off-by: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jingqi Liu <jingqi.liu@intel.com>
---
 hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
index 7cc419401b..2cd26bb9e9 100644
--- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
+++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c
@@ -1040,7 +1040,7 @@ static void nvdimm_build_common_dsm(Aml *dev,
 
     uuid_invalid = aml_lnot(aml_equal(uuid, expected_uuid));
 
-    unsupport = aml_if(aml_or(unpatched, uuid_invalid, NULL));
+    unsupport = aml_if(aml_lor(unpatched, uuid_invalid));
 
     /*
      * function 0 is called to inquire what functions are supported by
@@ -1072,10 +1072,9 @@ static void nvdimm_build_common_dsm(Aml *dev,
      * in the DSM Spec.
      */
     pckg = aml_arg(3);
-    ifctx = aml_if(aml_and(aml_equal(aml_object_type(pckg),
+    ifctx = aml_if(aml_land(aml_equal(aml_object_type(pckg),
                    aml_int(4 /* Package */)) /* It is a Package? */,
-                   aml_equal(aml_sizeof(pckg), aml_int(1)) /* 1 element? */,
-                   NULL));
+                   aml_equal(aml_sizeof(pckg), aml_int(1)) /* 1 element? */));
 
     pckg_index = aml_local(2);
     pckg_buf = aml_local(3);
-- 
2.31.1