From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, mhocko@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
void@manifault.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + cgroup-fix-racy-check-in-alloc_pagecache_max_30m-helper-function.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 13:20:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220422202049.A3764C385A4@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: cgroup: fix racy check in alloc_pagecache_max_30M() helper function
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
cgroup-fix-racy-check-in-alloc_pagecache_max_30m-helper-function.patch
This patch should soon appear at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/cgroup-fix-racy-check-in-alloc_pagecache_max_30m-helper-function.patch
and later at
https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/cgroup-fix-racy-check-in-alloc_pagecache_max_30m-helper-function.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Subject: cgroup: fix racy check in alloc_pagecache_max_30M() helper function
alloc_pagecache_max_30M() in the cgroup memcg tests performs a 50MB
pagecache allocation, which it expects to be capped at 30MB due to the
calling process having a memory.high setting of 30MB. After the
allocation, the function contains a check that verifies that MB(29) <
memory.current <= MB(30). This check can actually fail
non-deterministically.
The testcases that use this function are test_memcg_high() and
test_memcg_max(), which set memory.min and memory.max to 30MB respectively
for the cgroup under test. The allocation can slightly exceed this number
in both cases, and for memory.max, the process performing the allocation
will not have the OOM killer invoked as it's performing a pagecache
allocation. This patchset therefore updates the above check to instead
use the verify_close() helper function.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220422155728.3055914-6-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c~cgroup-fix-racy-check-in-alloc_pagecache_max_30m-helper-function
+++ a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
@@ -564,9 +564,14 @@ static int alloc_pagecache_max_30M(const
{
size_t size = MB(50);
int ret = -1;
- long current;
+ long current, high, max;
int fd;
+ high = cg_read_long(cgroup, "memory.high");
+ max = cg_read_long(cgroup, "memory.max");
+ if (high != MB(30) && max != MB(30))
+ goto cleanup;
+
fd = get_temp_fd();
if (fd < 0)
return -1;
@@ -575,7 +580,7 @@ static int alloc_pagecache_max_30M(const
goto cleanup;
current = cg_read_long(cgroup, "memory.current");
- if (current <= MB(29) || current > MB(30))
+ if (!values_close(current, MB(30), 5))
goto cleanup;
ret = 0;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from void@manifault.com are
cgroups-refactor-children-cgroups-in-memcg-tests.patch
cgroup-account-for-memory_recursiveprot-in-test_memcg_low.patch
cgroup-account-for-memory_localevents-in-test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events.patch
cgroup-removing-racy-check-in-test_memcg_sock.patch
cgroup-fix-racy-check-in-alloc_pagecache_max_30m-helper-function.patch
next reply other threads:[~2022-04-22 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-22 20:20 Andrew Morton [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-04-24 20:34 + cgroup-fix-racy-check-in-alloc_pagecache_max_30m-helper-function.patch added to -mm tree Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220422202049.A3764C385A4@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.