From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, oss-drivers@corigine.com,
Bin Chen <bin.chen@corigine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] nfp: VF rate limit support
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:53:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220425165321.1856ebb7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220422131945.948311-1-simon.horman@corigine.com>
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 15:19:45 +0200 Simon Horman wrote:
> + if (max_tx_rate > 0 || min_tx_rate > 0) {
> + if (max_tx_rate > 0 && max_tx_rate < min_tx_rate) {
> + nfp_warn(app->cpp, "min-tx-rate exceeds max_tx_rate.\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
This check should be moved to the core, I reckon.
> + if (max_tx_rate > NFP_NET_VF_RATE_MAX || min_tx_rate > NFP_NET_VF_RATE_MAX) {
Please wrap the lines at 80 chars, it's actually going to be easier
to read here.
> + nfp_warn(app->cpp, "tx-rate exceeds 0x%x.\n", NFP_NET_VF_RATE_MAX);
Does it really make sense to print the rate as hex?
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> @@ -261,5 +294,18 @@ int nfp_app_get_vf_config(struct net_device *netdev, int vf,
> ivi->trusted = FIELD_GET(NFP_NET_VF_CFG_CTRL_TRUST, flags);
> ivi->linkstate = FIELD_GET(NFP_NET_VF_CFG_CTRL_LINK_STATE, flags);
>
> + err = nfp_net_sriov_check(app, vf, NFP_NET_VF_CFG_MB_CAP_RATE, "rate");
> + if (!err) {
> + rate = readl(app->pf->vfcfg_tbl2 + vf_offset + NFP_NET_VF_CFG_RATE);
> +
> + ivi->max_tx_rate = FIELD_GET(NFP_NET_VF_CFG_MAX_RATE, rate);
> + ivi->min_tx_rate = FIELD_GET(NFP_NET_VF_CFG_MIN_RATE, rate);
> +
> + if (ivi->max_tx_rate == NFP_NET_VF_RATE_MAX)
> + ivi->max_tx_rate = 0;
If rate == NFP_NET_VF_RATE_MAX means unset then the check on set should
disallow it, IOW:
if (max_tx_rate >= NFP_NET_VF_RATE_MAX ||
min_tx_rate >= NFP_NET_VF_RATE_MAX) {
nfp_war(...
no?
> + if (ivi->min_tx_rate == NFP_NET_VF_RATE_MAX)
> + ivi->max_tx_rate = 0;
*squint* you check min and clear max, is this intentional?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-25 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-22 13:19 [PATCH net-next] nfp: VF rate limit support Simon Horman
2022-04-25 23:53 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-04-29 8:54 ` Bin Chen
2022-04-29 18:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-04-29 18:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220425165321.1856ebb7@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=bin.chen@corigine.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@corigine.com \
--cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.