From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
To: lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org,
pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com, senozhatsky@chromium.org
Cc: cujomalainey@google.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com, kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: ipc3-topology: Correct get_control_data for non bytes payload
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 11:50:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220427085011.21805-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
It is possible to craft a topology where sof_get_control_data() would do
out of bounds access because it expects that it is only called when the
payload is bytes type.
Confusingly it also handles other types of controls, but the payload
parsing implementation is only valid for bytes.
Fix the code to count the non bytes controls and instead of storing a
pointer to sof_abi_hdr in sof_widget_data (which is only valid for bytes),
store the pointer to the data itself and add a new member to save the size
of the data.
In case of non bytes controls we store the pointer to the chanv itself,
which is just an array of values at the end.
Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
---
Hi,
This should fix the out of bounds access, but I'm not sure what would be
expected in case of non bytes type of controls, so this patch will consider their
size(s) into the counting and copying.
Sergey, can you check if it is easy to backport for 5.10.111? There were changes
around this (code move to ipc3-topology.c and renames) but the logic remained the
same.
Regards,
Peter
sound/soc/sof/ipc3-topology.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/ipc3-topology.c b/sound/soc/sof/ipc3-topology.c
index 572bcbfdb356..8a083fd547ba 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/ipc3-topology.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/ipc3-topology.c
@@ -20,7 +20,8 @@
struct sof_widget_data {
int ctrl_type;
int ipc_cmd;
- struct sof_abi_hdr *pdata;
+ void *pdata;
+ size_t pdata_size;
struct snd_sof_control *control;
};
@@ -784,16 +785,23 @@ static int sof_get_control_data(struct snd_soc_component *scomp,
}
cdata = wdata[i].control->ipc_control_data;
- wdata[i].pdata = cdata->data;
- if (!wdata[i].pdata)
- return -EINVAL;
/* make sure data is valid - data can be updated at runtime */
- if (widget->dobj.widget.kcontrol_type[i] == SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BYTES &&
- wdata[i].pdata->magic != SOF_ABI_MAGIC)
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (widget->dobj.widget.kcontrol_type[i] == SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_BYTES) {
+ if (!cdata->data)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (cdata->data->magic != SOF_ABI_MAGIC)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ wdata[i].pdata = cdata->data->data;
+ wdata[i].pdata_size = cdata->data->size;
+ } else {
+ wdata[i].pdata = cdata->chanv; /* points to the control data union */
+ wdata[i].pdata_size = wdata[i].control->size;
+ }
- *size += wdata[i].pdata->size;
+ *size += wdata[i].pdata_size;
/* get data type */
switch (cdata->cmd) {
@@ -876,10 +884,12 @@ static int sof_process_load(struct snd_soc_component *scomp,
*/
if (ipc_data_size) {
for (i = 0; i < widget->num_kcontrols; i++) {
- memcpy(&process->data[offset],
- wdata[i].pdata->data,
- wdata[i].pdata->size);
- offset += wdata[i].pdata->size;
+ if (!wdata[i].pdata_size)
+ continue;
+
+ memcpy(&process->data[offset], wdata[i].pdata,
+ wdata[i].pdata_size);
+ offset += wdata[i].pdata_size;
}
}
--
2.36.0
next reply other threads:[~2022-04-27 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-27 8:50 Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2022-04-27 10:36 ` [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: ipc3-topology: Correct get_control_data for non bytes payload Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-04-27 10:43 ` Péter Ujfalusi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220427085011.21805-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--to=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cujomalainey@google.com \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.