From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
Cc: chuck.lever@oracle.com, jlayton@redhat.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v22 1/7] NFSD: add courteous server support for thread with only delegation
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 14:46:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220427184653.GE13471@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1651049573-29552-2-git-send-email-dai.ngo@oracle.com>
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 01:52:47AM -0700, Dai Ngo wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 234e852fcdfa..216bd77a8764 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -125,6 +125,8 @@ static void free_session(struct nfsd4_session *);
> static const struct nfsd4_callback_ops nfsd4_cb_recall_ops;
> static const struct nfsd4_callback_ops nfsd4_cb_notify_lock_ops;
>
> +static struct workqueue_struct *laundry_wq;
> +
> static bool is_session_dead(struct nfsd4_session *ses)
> {
> return ses->se_flags & NFS4_SESSION_DEAD;
> @@ -152,6 +154,7 @@ static __be32 get_client_locked(struct nfs4_client *clp)
> if (is_client_expired(clp))
> return nfserr_expired;
> atomic_inc(&clp->cl_rpc_users);
> + clp->cl_state = NFSD4_ACTIVE;
> return nfs_ok;
> }
>
> @@ -172,6 +175,7 @@ renew_client_locked(struct nfs4_client *clp)
>
> list_move_tail(&clp->cl_lru, &nn->client_lru);
> clp->cl_time = ktime_get_boottime_seconds();
> + clp->cl_state = NFSD4_ACTIVE;
> }
We shouldn't need that assignment in both places.
The laundromat really shouldn't let a client go to COURTESY while there
are rpc's in process for that client. So, let's just add that check to
the laundromat (see below), and then the assignment in
renew_client_locked becomes unnecessary.
> +static void
> +nfs4_get_client_reaplist(struct nfsd_net *nn, struct list_head *reaplist,
> + struct laundry_time *lt)
> +{
> + struct list_head *pos, *next;
> + struct nfs4_client *clp;
> + bool cour;
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(reaplist);
> + spin_lock(&nn->client_lock);
> + list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &nn->client_lru) {
> + clp = list_entry(pos, struct nfs4_client, cl_lru);
> + if (clp->cl_state == NFSD4_EXPIRABLE)
> + goto exp_client;
> + if (!state_expired(lt, clp->cl_time))
> + break;
> + if (!client_has_state_tmp(clp))
> + goto exp_client;
> + cour = (clp->cl_state == NFSD4_COURTESY);
> + if (cour && ktime_get_boottime_seconds() >=
> + (clp->cl_time + NFSD_COURTESY_CLIENT_TIMEOUT)) {
> + goto exp_client;
> + }
> + if (nfs4_anylock_blockers(clp)) {
> +exp_client:
> + if (mark_client_expired_locked(clp))
> + continue;
> + list_add(&clp->cl_lru, reaplist);
> + continue;
> + }
> + if (!cour)
> + cmpxchg(&clp->cl_state, NFSD4_ACTIVE, NFSD4_COURTESY);
So, as in mark_client_expired_locked, we should only be doing this if
clp_cl_rpc_users is 0.
Also, it should just be a simple assignment, the cmpxchg isn't necessary
here.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-27 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-27 8:52 [PATCH RFC v22 0/7] NFSD: Initial implementation of NFSv4 Courteous Server Dai Ngo
2022-04-27 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v22 1/7] NFSD: add courteous server support for thread with only delegation Dai Ngo
2022-04-27 16:12 ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-04-27 16:41 ` dai.ngo
2022-04-27 18:46 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2022-04-27 18:53 ` dai.ngo
2022-04-27 19:09 ` dai.ngo
2022-04-27 19:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-04-27 21:56 ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-04-27 22:52 ` dai.ngo
2022-04-28 1:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-04-28 3:44 ` dai.ngo
2022-04-28 6:36 ` dai.ngo
2022-04-27 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v22 2/7] NFSD: add support for share reservation conflict to courteous server Dai Ngo
2022-04-27 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v22 3/7] NFSD: move create/destroy of laundry_wq to init_nfsd and exit_nfsd Dai Ngo
2022-04-28 14:02 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-27 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v22 4/7] fs/lock: add helper locks_owner_has_blockers to check for blockers Dai Ngo
2022-04-27 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v22 5/7] fs/lock: add 2 callbacks to lock_manager_operations to resolve conflict Dai Ngo
2022-04-27 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v22 6/7] NFSD: add support for lock conflict to courteous server Dai Ngo
2022-04-27 18:50 ` dai.ngo
2022-04-28 2:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-04-28 3:47 ` dai.ngo
2022-04-27 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v22 7/7] NFSD: Show state of courtesy client in client info Dai Ngo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220427184653.GE13471@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.