All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: fix host memory buffer allocation size
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 17:06:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220428150644.GA22685@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5060d75e-46c0-4d29-a334-62c7e9714fa7@t-8ch.de>

On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 04:44:47PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Is the current code supposed to reach HMPRE? It does not for me.
> 
> The code tries to allocate memory for HMPRE in chunks.
> The best allocation would be to allocate one chunk for all of HMPRE.
> If this fails we half the chunk size on each iteration and try again.
> 
> On my hardware we start with a chunk_size of 4MiB and just allocate
> 8 (hmmaxd) * 4 = 32 MiB which is worse than 1 * 200MiB.

And that is because the hardware only has a limited set of descriptors.

Is there any real problem you are fixing with this?  Do you actually
see a performance difference on a relevant workload?


  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-28 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-28 10:19 [PATCH] nvme-pci: fix host memory buffer allocation size Thomas Weißschuh
2022-04-28 14:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-28 14:44   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2022-04-28 15:06     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-04-28 16:09       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2022-05-10  7:03         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-10 10:20           ` Thomas Weißschuh
2022-05-25 15:07             ` Thomas Weißschuh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220428150644.GA22685@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.