From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>,
Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: [PATCH v2 21/28] clk: Introduce clk_core_has_parent()
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:43:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220428164338.717443-22-maxime@cerno.tech> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220428164338.717443-1-maxime@cerno.tech>
We will need to know if a clk_core pointer has a given parent in other
functions, so let's create a clk_core_has_parent() function that
clk_has_parent() will call into.
For good measure, let's add some unit tests as well to make sure it
works properly.
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> # imx8mp
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> # exynos4210, meson g12b
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index add5d576fbd5..9af592cb3618 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -539,6 +539,26 @@ static bool mux_is_better_rate(unsigned long rate, unsigned long now,
static int clk_core_round_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
struct clk_rate_request *req);
+static bool clk_core_has_parent(struct clk_core *core, struct clk_core *parent)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ /* Optimize for the case where the parent is already the parent. */
+ if (core == parent)
+ return true;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < core->num_parents; i++) {
+ struct clk_core *tmp = clk_core_get_parent_by_index(core, i);
+ if (!tmp)
+ continue;
+
+ if (tmp == parent)
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
int clk_mux_determine_rate_flags(struct clk_hw *hw,
struct clk_rate_request *req,
unsigned long flags)
@@ -2588,25 +2608,11 @@ void clk_hw_reparent(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_hw *new_parent)
*/
bool clk_has_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
{
- struct clk_core *core, *parent_core;
- int i;
-
/* NULL clocks should be nops, so return success if either is NULL. */
if (!clk || !parent)
return true;
- core = clk->core;
- parent_core = parent->core;
-
- /* Optimize for the case where the parent is already the parent. */
- if (core->parent == parent_core)
- return true;
-
- for (i = 0; i < core->num_parents; i++)
- if (!strcmp(core->parents[i].name, parent_core->name))
- return true;
-
- return false;
+ return clk_core_has_parent(clk->core, parent->core);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_has_parent);
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
index 4c71c6570021..7e1a231a5a6b 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
@@ -473,8 +473,24 @@ clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_get_parent(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_is_match(parent, ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw.clk));
}
+/*
+ * Test that for a clock with a multiple parents, clk_has_parent()
+ * actually reports all of them as parents.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_has_parent(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+ struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_has_parent(clk, ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw.clk));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_has_parent(clk, ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw.clk));
+}
+
static struct kunit_case clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_get_parent),
+ KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_has_parent),
{}
};
@@ -884,6 +900,21 @@ clk_test_single_parent_mux_get_parent(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_is_match(parent, ctx->parent_ctx.hw.clk));
}
+/*
+ * Test that for a clock with a single parent, clk_has_parent() actually
+ * reports it as a parent.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_single_parent_mux_has_parent(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+ struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+ struct clk *parent = ctx->parent_ctx.hw.clk;
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_has_parent(clk, parent));
+}
+
/*
* Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single
* parent, if we set disjoints range on the parent and then the child,
@@ -982,6 +1013,7 @@ clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_child_smaller(struct kunit *test
static struct kunit_case clk_single_parent_mux_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_get_parent),
+ KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_has_parent),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_child_last),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_parent_last),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_child_smaller),
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-28 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-28 16:43 [PATCH v2 00/28] clk: More clock rate fixes and tests Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 01/28] clk: Drop the rate range on clk_put() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 02/28] clk: Skip clamping when rounding if there's no boundaries Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 03/28] clk: Introduce clk_get_rate_range() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 04/28] drm/vc4: hdmi: Rework hdmi_enable_4kp60 detection Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 05/28] clk: Mention that .recalc_rate can return 0 on error Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 06/28] clk: Clarify clk_get_rate() expectations Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 07/28] clk: tests: Add test suites description Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 08/28] clk: tests: Add reference to the orphan mux bug report Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 09/28] clk: tests: Add tests for uncached clock Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 10/28] clk: tests: Add tests for single parent mux Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 11/28] clk: tests: Add tests for mux with multiple parents Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 12/28] clk: tests: Add some tests for orphan " Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 13/28] clk: Take into account uncached clocks in clk_set_rate_range() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 14/28] clk: Fix clk_get_parent() documentation Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 15/28] clk: Set req_rate on reparenting Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 16/28] clk: Change clk_core_init_rate_req prototype Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 17/28] clk: Move clk_core_init_rate_req() from clk_core_round_rate_nolock() to its caller Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 18/28] clk: Introduce clk_hw_init_rate_request() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 19/28] clk: Add our request boundaries in clk_core_init_rate_req Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 20/28] clk: Switch from __clk_determine_rate to clk_core_round_rate_nolock Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 22/28] clk: Stop forwarding clk_rate_requests to the parent Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 23/28] clk: Zero the clk_rate_request structure Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 24/28] clk: Test the clock pointer in clk_hw_get_name() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 25/28] clk: Introduce the clk_hw_get_rate_range function Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 26/28] clk: qcom: clk-rcg2: Take clock boundaries into consideration for gfx3d Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 27/28] clk: tests: Add some tests for clk_get_rate_range() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-28 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 28/28] clk: tests: Add missing test case for ranges Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220428164338.717443-22-maxime@cerno.tech \
--to=maxime@cerno.tech \
--cc=alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=y.oudjana@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.