Re: [PATCH net-next v3 06/12] net: dsa: rzn1-a5psw: add Renesas RZ/N1 advanced 5 port switch driver

["Clément Léger" <clement.leger@bootlin.com>]

Le Wed, 4 May 2022 19:14:14 +0300,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> a écrit :

> On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 11:29:54AM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
> > Add Renesas RZ/N1 advanced 5 port switch driver. This switch handles 5
> > ports including 1 CPU management port. A MDIO bus is also exposed by
> > this switch and allows to communicate with PHYs connected to the ports.
> > Each switch port (except for the CPU management ports) is connected to
> > the MII converter.
> > 
> > This driver includes basic bridging support, more support will be added
> > later (vlan, etc).
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Jean-Pierre Geslin <jean-pierre.geslin@non.se.com>
> > Suggested-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <clement.leger@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> > +static void a5psw_port_disable(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
> > +{
> > +	struct a5psw *a5psw = ds->priv;
> > +
> > +	a5psw_port_authorize_set(a5psw, port, false);
> > +	a5psw_port_enable_set(a5psw, port, false);
> > +	a5psw_port_fdb_flush(a5psw, port);  
> 
> The bridge core takes care of this by setting the port state to
> DISABLED, which makes DSA call dsa_port_fast_age(), no?

Yes you are right.

> 
> Standalone ports shouldn't need fast ageing because they shouldn't have
> address learning enabled in the first place.

Ok, makes sense.

> 
> > +}  
> 
> > +static int a5psw_port_bridge_join(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> > +				  struct dsa_bridge bridge,
> > +				  bool *tx_fwd_offload,
> > +				  struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > +{
> > +	struct a5psw *a5psw = ds->priv;
> > +
> > +	/* We only support 1 bridge device */
> > +	if (a5psw->br_dev && bridge.dev != a5psw->br_dev)
> > +		return -EINVAL;  
> 
> return -EOPNOTSUPP, to allow software bridging.

Ok.

> You might also want to set an extack message here and avoid overwriting
> it in dsa_slave_changeupper() with "Offloading not supported", but say
> something more specific like "Forwarding offload supported for a single
> bridge".
> 
> > +		a5psw->br_dev = NULL;
> > +}  
> 
> > +static int a5psw_pcs_get(struct a5psw *a5psw)
> > +{
> > +	struct device_node *ports, *port, *pcs_node;
> > +	struct phylink_pcs *pcs;
> > +	int ret;
> > +	u32 reg;
> > +
> > +	ports = of_get_child_by_name(a5psw->dev->of_node, "ports");  
> 
> Can you please do:
> 
> 	ports = of_get_child_by_name(a5psw->dev->of_node, "ethernet-ports");
> 	if (!ports)
> 		ports = of_get_child_by_name(a5psw->dev->of_node, "ports");

Acked.

-- 
Clément Léger,
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineer at Bootlin
https://bootlin.com