From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
cohuck@redhat.com, schnelle@linux.ibm.com, farman@linux.ibm.com,
pmorel@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
svens@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, vneethv@linux.ibm.com,
oberpar@linux.ibm.com, freude@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: s390-iommu.c default domain conversion
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 20:35:52 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220509233552.GT49344@nvidia.com> (raw)
Hi s390 folks/Matthew
Since everyone is looking at iommu support for the nested domains,
could we also tackle the default domain conversion please? s390 is one
of the last 4 drivers that need it.
From what I can see it looks like when detach_dev() is called it
expects the platform's dma_ops to work in arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c ?
Has anyone thought about converting the dma_ops to use the normal DMA
API iommu support and run it through the iommu driver instead of
through the dma_ops?
Alternatively perhaps we can keep the dma_ops with some iommu
side-change.
Thanks,
Jason
next reply other threads:[~2022-05-09 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-09 23:35 Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-05-10 15:25 ` s390-iommu.c default domain conversion Matthew Rosato
2022-05-10 16:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-20 13:05 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-05-20 13:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-20 15:17 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-05-20 15:51 ` Robin Murphy
2022-05-20 15:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-20 16:26 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-05-20 16:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220509233552.GT49344@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.