From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.90_1) id 1nonc4-0002F9-O1 for mharc-qemu-riscv@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2022 10:46:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nonc2-0002Bk-Iz for qemu-riscv@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2022 10:46:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]:36466) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nonc0-0001Dl-Un for qemu-riscv@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2022 10:46:50 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id j14so2108379plx.3 for ; Wed, 11 May 2022 07:46:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ventanamicro.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TnIJjDgh3bHop5ZAYtcGfmn1Q0AVEeirrNZPW/QsPio=; b=TJNy2tqXKs8SwnmbLsBDNk6+m+L2oaT6pqDKuF0okaabi6mSrlRR5JMMWDGQPa1edo frbd33EtJMZHDqlOUWdqqJWy7FdN4Dfp6Cgq4hKJEIIG+UmgpvGp9WQwvYHotDlwSYcL Iyh6575C1ZowFgPfJEWp3o/cSER1Nra1kbOEroC3byvjBYQ8pG5sW64K70gRkLsnKtFc HJaSF2TChcc0SuCOttpOS3pMrch4TbG/HG/iyaPGN4QUCvgaTYJbT8/WmbF69QD6Pfe/ VMlYUXdW05vXKULTgt1mZELKzlRI4VWEyb0iC8UXXao233SYmAsafreCq+QSM/KYg7cF RM1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TnIJjDgh3bHop5ZAYtcGfmn1Q0AVEeirrNZPW/QsPio=; b=Jv8aJOS9GycqbGffw+ldcyAOlF86txksZiFx26fxB0ymiHGp/bLvDJQmT6KpX37fVN ip28knWrdMwn21tzhGGIvjjwwQrex7t7Dk+VPos5vjs4KSNv/PMTdWAL4dUbbOhFSIdi kCkW+mfBsqG46hd9usB6A5CYiCrUpQCD0WdK3FJ9uHABXQ6LZEPLWvzgvVnw5yRZYLUL qEkjO3gT4k0SxTdmQKdWSEWzVVJEAkoug7mZ2VgZpA/9/vfXz5+D0ll8/QNW6BajhXF+ GymZRy4sjATh9kR7OAcKuck4PuUMTQ/GRhqtiZd4zmj3CQc9rHkE8PIvH45SwHYWsZCV kBgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531G2+F2i3maL9MxSZCIEkMJFELrEfGCiTbXnvBEB0vOeCq7b1sy lG1iRpurOGFYnkewCW9fWtZitw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymHur2iOHc9BMuKB124GlG6z+tRrfO+1XqjpwhSSQ+RXnNMDrUL1Ry+6dbVSyYsVT6cBIrOw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4c09:b0:1dc:6c30:f230 with SMTP id na9-20020a17090b4c0900b001dc6c30f230mr5816166pjb.110.1652280407467; Wed, 11 May 2022 07:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from anup-ubuntu64-vm.. ([171.76.113.90]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x2-20020a170902820200b0015eafc485c8sm1958726pln.289.2022.05.11.07.46.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 May 2022 07:46:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Anup Patel To: Peter Maydell , Palmer Dabbelt , Alistair Francis , Sagar Karandikar Cc: Atish Patra , Anup Patel , qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anup Patel , Frank Chang , Alistair Francis , Atish Patra Subject: [PATCH v2 5/8] target/riscv: Don't force update priv spec version to latest Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 20:15:25 +0530 Message-Id: <20220511144528.393530-6-apatel@ventanamicro.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20220511144528.393530-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com> References: <20220511144528.393530-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c; envelope-from=apatel@ventanamicro.com; helo=mail-pl1-x62c.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-riscv@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 14:46:51 -0000 The riscv_cpu_realize() sets priv spec verion to v1.12 when it is when "env->priv_ver == 0" (i.e. default v1.10) because the enum value of priv spec v1.10 is zero. Due to above issue, the sifive_u machine will see priv spec v1.12 instead of priv spec v1.10. To fix this issue, we set latest priv spec version (i.e. v1.12) for base rv64/rv32 cpu and riscv_cpu_realize() will override priv spec version only when "cpu->cfg.priv_spec != NULL". Fixes: 7100fe6c2441 ("target/riscv: Enable privileged spec version 1.12") Signed-off-by: Anup Patel Reviewed-by: Frank Chang Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis Reviewed-by: Atish Patra --- target/riscv/cpu.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c index 9a5be9732d..f3b61dfd63 100644 --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c @@ -169,6 +169,8 @@ static void rv64_base_cpu_init(Object *obj) CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env; /* We set this in the realise function */ set_misa(env, MXL_RV64, 0); + /* Set latest version of privileged specification */ + set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0); } static void rv64_sifive_u_cpu_init(Object *obj) @@ -204,6 +206,8 @@ static void rv32_base_cpu_init(Object *obj) CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env; /* We set this in the realise function */ set_misa(env, MXL_RV32, 0); + /* Set latest version of privileged specification */ + set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0); } static void rv32_sifive_u_cpu_init(Object *obj) @@ -509,7 +513,7 @@ static void riscv_cpu_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env; RISCVCPUClass *mcc = RISCV_CPU_GET_CLASS(dev); CPUClass *cc = CPU_CLASS(mcc); - int priv_version = 0; + int priv_version = -1; Error *local_err = NULL; cpu_exec_realizefn(cs, &local_err); @@ -533,10 +537,8 @@ static void riscv_cpu_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) } } - if (priv_version) { + if (priv_version >= PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0) { set_priv_version(env, priv_version); - } else if (!env->priv_ver) { - set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0); } if (cpu->cfg.mmu) { -- 2.34.1