From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 11/11] selftests/bpf: verify lsm_cgroup struct sock access
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 15:55:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220518225531.558008-12-sdf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220518225531.558008-1-sdf@google.com>
sk_priority & sk_mark are writable, the rest is readonly.
One interesting thing here is that the verifier doesn't
really force me to add NULL checks anywhere :-/
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c
index 29292ec40343..64b6830e03f5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c
@@ -270,8 +270,77 @@ static void test_lsm_cgroup_functional(void)
lsm_cgroup__destroy(skel);
}
+static int field_offset(const char *type, const char *field)
+{
+ const struct btf_member *memb;
+ const struct btf_type *tp;
+ const char *name;
+ struct btf *btf;
+ int btf_id;
+ int i;
+
+ btf = btf__load_vmlinux_btf();
+ if (!btf)
+ return -1;
+
+ btf_id = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, type, BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
+ if (btf_id < 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ tp = btf__type_by_id(btf, btf_id);
+ memb = btf_members(tp);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < btf_vlen(tp); i++) {
+ name = btf__name_by_offset(btf,
+ memb->name_off);
+ if (strcmp(field, name) == 0)
+ return memb->offset / 8;
+ memb++;
+ }
+
+ return -1;
+}
+
+static bool sk_writable_field(const char *type, const char *field, int size)
+{
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts,
+ .expected_attach_type = BPF_LSM_CGROUP);
+ struct bpf_insn insns[] = {
+ /* r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0) */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ /* r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + offsetof(struct socket, sk)) */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, field_offset("socket", "sk")),
+ /* r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 + offsetof(struct sock, <field>)) */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(size, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, field_offset(type, field)),
+ /* *(u64 *)(r1 + offsetof(struct sock, <field>)) = r2 */
+ BPF_STX_MEM(size, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, field_offset(type, field)),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ };
+ int fd;
+
+ opts.attach_btf_id = libbpf_find_vmlinux_btf_id("socket_post_create",
+ opts.expected_attach_type);
+
+ fd = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM, NULL, "GPL", insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), &opts);
+ if (fd >= 0)
+ close(fd);
+ return fd >= 0;
+}
+
+static void test_lsm_cgroup_access(void)
+{
+ ASSERT_FALSE(sk_writable_field("sock_common", "skc_family", BPF_H), "skc_family");
+ ASSERT_FALSE(sk_writable_field("sock", "sk_sndtimeo", BPF_DW), "sk_sndtimeo");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(sk_writable_field("sock", "sk_priority", BPF_W), "sk_priority");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(sk_writable_field("sock", "sk_mark", BPF_W), "sk_mark");
+ ASSERT_FALSE(sk_writable_field("sock", "sk_pacing_rate", BPF_DW), "sk_pacing_rate");
+}
+
void test_lsm_cgroup(void)
{
if (test__start_subtest("functional"))
test_lsm_cgroup_functional();
+ if (test__start_subtest("access"))
+ test_lsm_cgroup_access();
}
--
2.36.1.124.g0e6072fb45-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-18 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-18 22:55 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/11] bpf: cgroup_sock lsm flavor Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/11] bpf: add bpf_func_t and trampoline helpers Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-20 0:45 ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-21 0:03 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/11] bpf: convert cgroup_bpf.progs to hlist Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/11] bpf: per-cgroup lsm flavor Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-20 1:00 ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-21 0:03 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-23 15:41 ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-21 0:53 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24 2:15 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24 5:40 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24 15:56 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24 5:57 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/11] bpf: minimize number of allocated lsm slots per program Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-21 6:56 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24 2:14 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24 5:53 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/11] bpf: implement BPF_PROG_QUERY for BPF_LSM_CGROUP Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-19 2:31 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-19 14:57 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-23 23:23 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24 2:15 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24 3:48 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24 15:55 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24 17:50 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-24 23:45 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-25 4:03 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-25 4:39 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-25 16:01 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-25 17:02 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-25 20:39 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-25 21:25 ` sdf
2022-05-26 0:03 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-26 1:23 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-26 2:50 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-31 23:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/11] bpf: allow writing to a subset of sock fields from lsm progtype Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/11] libbpf: implement bpf_prog_query_opts Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-23 23:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24 2:15 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24 3:45 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24 4:01 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/11] libbpf: add lsm_cgoup_sock type Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-23 23:26 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24 2:15 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/11] bpftool: implement cgroup tree for BPF_LSM_CGROUP Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/11] selftests/bpf: lsm_cgroup functional test Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-18 22:55 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2022-05-23 23:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 11/11] selftests/bpf: verify lsm_cgroup struct sock access Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-24 2:15 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-05-24 3:46 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-19 23:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/11] bpf: cgroup_sock lsm flavor Yonghong Song
2022-05-19 23:39 ` Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220518225531.558008-12-sdf@google.com \
--to=sdf@google.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.