All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, tytso@mit.edu,
	adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
	lczerner@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	yi.zhang@huawei.com, yebin10@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com,
	libaokun1@huawei.com, Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ext4: fix bug_on ext4_mb_use_inode_pa
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 04:52:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202205240409.QDeavDo9-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220523141658.2919003-2-libaokun1@huawei.com>

Hi Baokun,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on tytso-ext4/dev]
[also build test WARNING on linux/master linus/master v5.18 next-20220523]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Baokun-Li/ext4-fix-two-bugs-in-ext4_mb_normalize_request/20220523-221114
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git dev
config: i386-randconfig-a015-20220523 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220524/202205240409.QDeavDo9-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 10c9ecce9f6096e18222a331c5e7d085bd813f75)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/74180b479936a47521200fae540eafdf35ca5a07
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Baokun-Li/ext4-fix-two-bugs-in-ext4_mb_normalize_request/20220523-221114
        git checkout 74180b479936a47521200fae540eafdf35ca5a07
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash fs/ext4/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> fs/ext4/mballoc.c:4113:10: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types ('typeof (start) *' (aka 'unsigned int *') and 'typeof (({
       typeof (ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) __x = (ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical);
       __x - (__x % ((EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb)->s_blocks_per_group)));
   })) *' (aka 'unsigned long *')) [-Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types]
           start = max(start, rounddown(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical,
                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/minmax.h:52:19: note: expanded from macro 'max'
   #define max(x, y)       __careful_cmp(x, y, >)
                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/minmax.h:36:24: note: expanded from macro '__careful_cmp'
           __builtin_choose_expr(__safe_cmp(x, y), \
                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/minmax.h:26:4: note: expanded from macro '__safe_cmp'
                   (__typecheck(x, y) && __no_side_effects(x, y))
                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/minmax.h:20:28: note: expanded from macro '__typecheck'
           (!!(sizeof((typeof(x) *)1 == (typeof(y) *)1)))
                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   1 warning generated.


vim +4113 fs/ext4/mballoc.c

  4016	
  4017	/*
  4018	 * Normalization means making request better in terms of
  4019	 * size and alignment
  4020	 */
  4021	static noinline_for_stack void
  4022	ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
  4023					struct ext4_allocation_request *ar)
  4024	{
  4025		struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb);
  4026		int bsbits, max;
  4027		ext4_lblk_t end;
  4028		loff_t size, start_off;
  4029		loff_t orig_size __maybe_unused;
  4030		ext4_lblk_t start;
  4031		struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(ac->ac_inode);
  4032		struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa;
  4033	
  4034		/* do normalize only data requests, metadata requests
  4035		   do not need preallocation */
  4036		if (!(ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_HINT_DATA))
  4037			return;
  4038	
  4039		/* sometime caller may want exact blocks */
  4040		if (unlikely(ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY))
  4041			return;
  4042	
  4043		/* caller may indicate that preallocation isn't
  4044		 * required (it's a tail, for example) */
  4045		if (ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_HINT_NOPREALLOC)
  4046			return;
  4047	
  4048		if (ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_HINT_GROUP_ALLOC) {
  4049			ext4_mb_normalize_group_request(ac);
  4050			return ;
  4051		}
  4052	
  4053		bsbits = ac->ac_sb->s_blocksize_bits;
  4054	
  4055		/* first, let's learn actual file size
  4056		 * given current request is allocated */
  4057		size = ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical + EXT4_C2B(sbi, ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len);
  4058		size = size << bsbits;
  4059		if (size < i_size_read(ac->ac_inode))
  4060			size = i_size_read(ac->ac_inode);
  4061		orig_size = size;
  4062	
  4063		/* max size of free chunks */
  4064		max = 2 << bsbits;
  4065	
  4066	#define NRL_CHECK_SIZE(req, size, max, chunk_size)	\
  4067			(req <= (size) || max <= (chunk_size))
  4068	
  4069		/* first, try to predict filesize */
  4070		/* XXX: should this table be tunable? */
  4071		start_off = 0;
  4072		if (size <= 16 * 1024) {
  4073			size = 16 * 1024;
  4074		} else if (size <= 32 * 1024) {
  4075			size = 32 * 1024;
  4076		} else if (size <= 64 * 1024) {
  4077			size = 64 * 1024;
  4078		} else if (size <= 128 * 1024) {
  4079			size = 128 * 1024;
  4080		} else if (size <= 256 * 1024) {
  4081			size = 256 * 1024;
  4082		} else if (size <= 512 * 1024) {
  4083			size = 512 * 1024;
  4084		} else if (size <= 1024 * 1024) {
  4085			size = 1024 * 1024;
  4086		} else if (NRL_CHECK_SIZE(size, 4 * 1024 * 1024, max, 2 * 1024)) {
  4087			start_off = ((loff_t)ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical >>
  4088							(21 - bsbits)) << 21;
  4089			size = 2 * 1024 * 1024;
  4090		} else if (NRL_CHECK_SIZE(size, 8 * 1024 * 1024, max, 4 * 1024)) {
  4091			start_off = ((loff_t)ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical >>
  4092								(22 - bsbits)) << 22;
  4093			size = 4 * 1024 * 1024;
  4094		} else if (NRL_CHECK_SIZE(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len,
  4095						(8<<20)>>bsbits, max, 8 * 1024)) {
  4096			start_off = ((loff_t)ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical >>
  4097								(23 - bsbits)) << 23;
  4098			size = 8 * 1024 * 1024;
  4099		} else {
  4100			start_off = (loff_t) ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical << bsbits;
  4101			size	  = (loff_t) EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb),
  4102						      ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len) << bsbits;
  4103		}
  4104		size = size >> bsbits;
  4105		start = start_off >> bsbits;
  4106	
  4107		/*
  4108		 * For tiny groups (smaller than 8MB) the chosen allocation
  4109		 * alignment may be larger than group size. Make sure the
  4110		 * alignment does not move allocation to a different group which
  4111		 * makes mballoc fail assertions later.
  4112		 */
> 4113		start = max(start, rounddown(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical,
  4114				EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(ac->ac_sb)));
  4115	
  4116		/* don't cover already allocated blocks in selected range */
  4117		if (ar->pleft && start <= ar->lleft) {
  4118			size -= ar->lleft + 1 - start;
  4119			start = ar->lleft + 1;
  4120		}
  4121		if (ar->pright && start + size - 1 >= ar->lright)
  4122			size -= start + size - ar->lright;
  4123	
  4124		/*
  4125		 * Trim allocation request for filesystems with artificially small
  4126		 * groups.
  4127		 */
  4128		if (size > EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(ac->ac_sb))
  4129			size = EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(ac->ac_sb);
  4130	
  4131		end = start + size;
  4132	
  4133		/* check we don't cross already preallocated blocks */
  4134		rcu_read_lock();
  4135		list_for_each_entry_rcu(pa, &ei->i_prealloc_list, pa_inode_list) {
  4136			ext4_lblk_t pa_end;
  4137	
  4138			if (pa->pa_deleted)
  4139				continue;
  4140			spin_lock(&pa->pa_lock);
  4141			if (pa->pa_deleted) {
  4142				spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock);
  4143				continue;
  4144			}
  4145	
  4146			pa_end = pa->pa_lstart + EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb),
  4147							  pa->pa_len);
  4148	
  4149			/* PA must not overlap original request */
  4150			BUG_ON(!(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical >= pa_end ||
  4151				ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical < pa->pa_lstart));
  4152	
  4153			/* skip PAs this normalized request doesn't overlap with */
  4154			if (pa->pa_lstart >= end || pa_end <= start) {
  4155				spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock);
  4156				continue;
  4157			}
  4158			BUG_ON(pa->pa_lstart <= start && pa_end >= end);
  4159	
  4160			/* adjust start or end to be adjacent to this pa */
  4161			if (pa_end <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) {
  4162				BUG_ON(pa_end < start);
  4163				start = pa_end;
  4164			} else if (pa->pa_lstart > ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) {
  4165				BUG_ON(pa->pa_lstart > end);
  4166				end = pa->pa_lstart;
  4167			}
  4168			spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock);
  4169		}
  4170		rcu_read_unlock();
  4171		size = end - start;
  4172	
  4173		/* XXX: extra loop to check we really don't overlap preallocations */
  4174		rcu_read_lock();
  4175		list_for_each_entry_rcu(pa, &ei->i_prealloc_list, pa_inode_list) {
  4176			ext4_lblk_t pa_end;
  4177	
  4178			spin_lock(&pa->pa_lock);
  4179			if (pa->pa_deleted == 0) {
  4180				pa_end = pa->pa_lstart + EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb),
  4181								  pa->pa_len);
  4182				BUG_ON(!(start >= pa_end || end <= pa->pa_lstart));
  4183			}
  4184			spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock);
  4185		}
  4186		rcu_read_unlock();
  4187	
  4188		if (start + size <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical &&
  4189				start > ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) {
  4190			ext4_msg(ac->ac_sb, KERN_ERR,
  4191				 "start %lu, size %lu, fe_logical %lu",
  4192				 (unsigned long) start, (unsigned long) size,
  4193				 (unsigned long) ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical);
  4194			BUG();
  4195		}
  4196		BUG_ON(size <= 0 || size > EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(ac->ac_sb));
  4197	
  4198		/* now prepare goal request */
  4199	
  4200		/* XXX: is it better to align blocks WRT to logical
  4201		 * placement or satisfy big request as is */
  4202		ac->ac_g_ex.fe_logical = start;
  4203		ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len = EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, size);
  4204	
  4205		/* define goal start in order to merge */
  4206		if (ar->pright && (ar->lright == (start + size))) {
  4207			/* merge to the right */
  4208			ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(ac->ac_sb, ar->pright - size,
  4209							&ac->ac_f_ex.fe_group,
  4210							&ac->ac_f_ex.fe_start);
  4211			ac->ac_flags |= EXT4_MB_HINT_TRY_GOAL;
  4212		}
  4213		if (ar->pleft && (ar->lleft + 1 == start)) {
  4214			/* merge to the left */
  4215			ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(ac->ac_sb, ar->pleft + 1,
  4216							&ac->ac_f_ex.fe_group,
  4217							&ac->ac_f_ex.fe_start);
  4218			ac->ac_flags |= EXT4_MB_HINT_TRY_GOAL;
  4219		}
  4220	
  4221		mb_debug(ac->ac_sb, "goal: %lld(was %lld) blocks at %u\n", size,
  4222			 orig_size, start);
  4223	}
  4224	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-23 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-23 14:16 [PATCH v2 0/2] ext4: fix two bugs in ext4_mb_normalize_request Baokun Li
2022-05-23 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ext4: fix bug_on ext4_mb_use_inode_pa Baokun Li
2022-05-23 20:52   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-05-23 22:17   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-23 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ext4: correct the judgment of BUG in ext4_mb_normalize_request Baokun Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202205240409.QDeavDo9-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=hulkci@huawei.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yebin10@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.