diff for duplicates of <20220601175743.GA28082@lst.de> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index f3043d6..c317c91 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ "ref\0YpemDuzdoaO3rijX@Ryzen-9-3900X.\0" "From\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 09/15] swiotlb: make the swiotlb_init interface more useful\0" - "Date\0Wed, 1 Jun 2022 19:57:43 +0200\0" + "Date\0Wed, 01 Jun 2022 17:57:43 +0000\0" "To\0Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>\0" "Cc\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>" iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org @@ -45,4 +45,4 @@ "Do you get a similar performance with the new kernel without\n" swiotlb=force as the old one with that argument by any chance? -2ce6a198498ef78a762342428ce7db3e9a0a219a6eef132ae1c5694c1113048b +20047ade1871d87adf6d09adb1737be4ca3ca5ae480ad211c83bb479e4f4be70
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 6269784..c027a99 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -10,3 +10,8 @@ Nothing interesting. But the performance numbers almost look like swiotlb=force got ignored before (even if I can't explain why). Do you get a similar performance with the new kernel without swiotlb=force as the old one with that argument by any chance? + +_______________________________________________ +iommu mailing list +iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org +https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index f3043d6..a8bf08e 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -7,29 +7,27 @@ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 09/15] swiotlb: make the swiotlb_init interface more useful\0" "Date\0Wed, 1 Jun 2022 19:57:43 +0200\0" "To\0Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>\0" - "Cc\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>" - iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org + "Cc\0linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" x86@kernel.org - Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> - Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> - Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> - David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> - Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> - Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org - xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org - linux-mips@vger.kernel.org - linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org + linux-pci@vger.kernel.org linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org + Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> linux-s390@vger.kernel.org - linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org + Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> + Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - " linux-pci@vger.kernel.org\0" + xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org + David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> + Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> + Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> + Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> + linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org + linux-mips@vger.kernel.org + iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org + " Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 10:46:54AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:\n" @@ -43,6 +41,11 @@ "Nothing interesting. But the performance numbers almost look like\n" "swiotlb=force got ignored before (even if I can't explain why).\n" "Do you get a similar performance with the new kernel without\n" - swiotlb=force as the old one with that argument by any chance? + "swiotlb=force as the old one with that argument by any chance?\n" + "\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "iommu mailing list\n" + "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org\n" + https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu -2ce6a198498ef78a762342428ce7db3e9a0a219a6eef132ae1c5694c1113048b +044fec122679f5097d2161a559523f12c05e65ce07c4216a88fb5a476f7750ba
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt index 6269784..71349b5 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N3/1.txt @@ -10,3 +10,9 @@ Nothing interesting. But the performance numbers almost look like swiotlb=force got ignored before (even if I can't explain why). Do you get a similar performance with the new kernel without swiotlb=force as the old one with that argument by any chance? + + +_______________________________________________ +linux-riscv mailing list +linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org +http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest index f3043d6..19f86ca 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N3/content_digest @@ -43,6 +43,12 @@ "Nothing interesting. But the performance numbers almost look like\n" "swiotlb=force got ignored before (even if I can't explain why).\n" "Do you get a similar performance with the new kernel without\n" - swiotlb=force as the old one with that argument by any chance? + "swiotlb=force as the old one with that argument by any chance?\n" + "\n" + "\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "linux-riscv mailing list\n" + "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org\n" + http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv -2ce6a198498ef78a762342428ce7db3e9a0a219a6eef132ae1c5694c1113048b +0fa35e98f853ca3b67a29e4e2a1b9aa2c3b9c64fc29018580a383e91537055bc
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N4/content_digest index f3043d6..1618c62 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N4/content_digest @@ -7,29 +7,29 @@ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 09/15] swiotlb: make the swiotlb_init interface more useful\0" "Date\0Wed, 1 Jun 2022 19:57:43 +0200\0" "To\0Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>\0" - "Cc\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>" - iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org + "Cc\0linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" x86@kernel.org - Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> - Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> + linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org + linux-pci@vger.kernel.org + linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org + Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> + linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> + Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> + tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net + xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> - Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> - Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> + Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> + Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> + Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org - xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org - linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org - linux-mips@vger.kernel.org + Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org - linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org - linux-s390@vger.kernel.org - linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org - tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - " linux-pci@vger.kernel.org\0" + linux-mips@vger.kernel.org + iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org + Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> + " Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 10:46:54AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:\n" @@ -45,4 +45,4 @@ "Do you get a similar performance with the new kernel without\n" swiotlb=force as the old one with that argument by any chance? -2ce6a198498ef78a762342428ce7db3e9a0a219a6eef132ae1c5694c1113048b +b7389d3a8c6997c5f5728fa4834593e877867ea178616df12d5b41b683015055
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N5/1.txt index 6269784..f256bd4 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N5/1.txt @@ -10,3 +10,9 @@ Nothing interesting. But the performance numbers almost look like swiotlb=force got ignored before (even if I can't explain why). Do you get a similar performance with the new kernel without swiotlb=force as the old one with that argument by any chance? + + +_______________________________________________ +linux-arm-kernel mailing list +linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org +http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N5/content_digest index f3043d6..2efa666 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N5/content_digest @@ -43,6 +43,12 @@ "Nothing interesting. But the performance numbers almost look like\n" "swiotlb=force got ignored before (even if I can't explain why).\n" "Do you get a similar performance with the new kernel without\n" - swiotlb=force as the old one with that argument by any chance? + "swiotlb=force as the old one with that argument by any chance?\n" + "\n" + "\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n" + "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n" + http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -2ce6a198498ef78a762342428ce7db3e9a0a219a6eef132ae1c5694c1113048b +1687745ffd163f7823c7f5b9fb900a188b97c52970fed81603d0a5d537f16748
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.