All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: reject log replay if there is unsupported RO flag
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:49:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220607094914.GC3554947@falcondesktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <429396b1039ec416504bc2bffca36d66ec8b52e2.1654569076.git.wqu@suse.com>

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 10:31:46AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> [BUG]
> If we have a btrfs image with dirty log, along with an unsupported RO
> compatible flag:
> 
> log_root		30474240
> ...
> compat_flags		0x0
> compat_ro_flags		0x40000003
> 			( FREE_SPACE_TREE |
> 			  FREE_SPACE_TREE_VALID |
> 			  unknown flag: 0x40000000 )
> 
> Then even if we can only mount it RO, we will still cause metadata
> update for log replay:
> 
>  BTRFS info (device dm-1): flagging fs with big metadata feature
>  BTRFS info (device dm-1): using free space tree
>  BTRFS info (device dm-1): has skinny extents
>  BTRFS info (device dm-1): start tree-log replay
> 
> This is definitely against RO compact flag requirement.
> 
> [CAUSE]
> RO compact flag only forces us to do RO mount, but we will still do log
> replay for plain RO mount.
> 
> Thus this will result us to do log replay and update metadata.
> 
> This can be very problematic for new RO compat flag, for example older
> kernel can not understand v2 cache, and if we allow metadata update on
> RO mount and invalidate/corrupt v2 cache.
> 
> [FIX]
> Just set the nologreplay flag if there is any unsupported RO compact
> flag.
> 
> This will reject log replay no matter if we have dirty log or not, with
> the following message:
> 
>  BTRFS info (device dm-1): disabling log replay due to unsupported ro compat features
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #4.9+
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> index fe309db9f5ff..d06f1a176b5b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -3655,6 +3655,14 @@ int __cold open_ctree(struct super_block *sb, struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_device
>  		err = -EINVAL;
>  		goto fail_alloc;
>  	}
> +	/*
> +	 * We have unsupported RO compat features, although RO mounted, we
> +	 * should any metadata write, including the log replay.
> +	 * Or we can screw up whatever the new feature requires.
> +	 */
> +	if (features)
> +		btrfs_set_and_info(fs_info, NOLOGREPLAY,
> +		"disabling log replay due to unsupported ro compat features");

Well, this might be surprising for users.

On mount, it's expected that everything that was fsynced is available.
Yes, there's a message printed informing the logs were not replayed,
but this allows for applications to read stale data.

I think just failing the mount and printing a message telling that the
fs needs to be explicitly mounted with -o nologreplay is less prone to
having stale data being read and used.

Thanks.

>  
>  	if (sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE) {
>  		struct btrfs_subpage_info *subpage_info;
> -- 
> 2.36.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-07  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-07  2:31 [PATCH] btrfs: reject log replay if there is unsupported RO flag Qu Wenruo
2022-06-07  9:49 ` Filipe Manana [this message]
2022-06-07 10:23   ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220607094914.GC3554947@falcondesktop \
    --to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.