From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA15BC433EF for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5886B8194C; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:59:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e0SJcfO2Gsn6; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:59:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9527181424; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BAF1BF4D7 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:58:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018B381424 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:58:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g1kDtu1UKoXD for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:58:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (relay8-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.201]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB3078141C for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:58:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A1D71BF204; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:58:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1655222334; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QzWdGtjCjt/RASQ9Luwd5qX2fcsVI5qbd24+J8qSHag=; b=eAdpvjuXRFQqD2W73Mvp7nyJlMqaD6xi64j+Z0dNdlO38UqkjK+UlzebC1ls7INQJrmm9O 7Y5qvzgouLqfS7pEO3z5g3NQ4z4qsb0hSFbuYNG8TT7iOKe/7Kkw/yxSZhICt2UqlbYN7k I/nsyIXqQ+6ZMvAsBmcnpsJPd77FgHUOuwgUUj65dd9jHF8MB5RRt68i/9NWENNsbk3rlc hjAcHjmoqfsAC5vFI0fCgVvy3PbGpIX2/ru5ezMIcrkqQfpFu6YawQPbdni6Iu0kVujb9s Ajex+6j6adSErOzvrynmd/DkDD36grXKA750hxEA1p074vDscENwuWLcFCNfnw== Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 17:58:44 +0200 To: Arnout Vandecappelle Message-ID: <20220614175844.45509426@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <12178427-e595-be4e-5da5-d4cf1718b9e2@mind.be> References: <20220608071027.3384469-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <20220608071027.3384469-8-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <12178427-e595-be4e-5da5-d4cf1718b9e2@mind.be> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 07/14] toolchain/toolchain-external: add BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_HAS_NO_GDBSERVER option X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Giulio Benetti , Romain Naour , "Yann E. MORIN" , Thomas De Schampheleire , Buildroot List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 17:34:20 +0200 Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > This could have been simplified to > > depends on BR2_PACKAGE_GDB_ARCH_SUPPORTS > > but this way is more flexible so better I guess. Yes, I thought about this (should maybe have written it in the commit log), but I thought: external toolchains can very well rely on patched GDB versions that could potentially have support for an architecture that's not supported in upstream GDB. I agree this is a corner case, so if we decide that's not worth considering, I would totally support using BR2_PACKAGE_GDB_ARCH_SUPPORTS. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot