All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: Specify the operation type when calling blk_mq_map_queue()
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 08:08:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220615060851.GE22115@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YqkoWUjOPgpqzn4E@T590>

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 08:31:21AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > -	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = blk_mq_map_queue(q, 0, ctx);
> > +	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = blk_mq_map_queue(q, REQ_OP_WRITE, ctx);
> 
> The change itself doesn't make a difference, since both results in choosing
> HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT, but passing REQ_OP_WRITE is a bit misleading.

Well, the argument is an operationm so we better pass in a correct
operation (at some point we should look into a __bitwise annotation
or similar to make it clean).  And as 0 is REQ_OP_READ, we will end
up with the HCTX_TYPE_READ hctx IFF someone configures read queues
and uses an sq only schedule.  Which is a completely stupid but
possible setup.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-15  6:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-14 17:57 [PATCH 0/3] Three small block layer patches Bart Van Assche
2022-06-14 17:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] blk-iocost: Simplify ioc_rqos_done() Bart Van Assche
2022-06-14 18:26   ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-15  5:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-14 17:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: Rename a blk_mq_map_queue() argument Bart Van Assche
2022-06-15  5:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-14 17:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: Specify the operation type when calling blk_mq_map_queue() Bart Van Assche
2022-06-14 19:31   ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-15  0:31   ` Ming Lei
2022-06-15  6:08     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-06-15  6:24       ` Ming Lei
2022-06-17 18:25       ` Bart Van Assche
2022-06-20  7:29         ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220615060851.GE22115@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.