From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Contextual conflict between kspp and rcu trees
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:28:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202206151326.E34CDE453@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yqo5SequJuC2qX6S@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 12:55:53PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Per the above RCU commit and commit 6c5218715286 ("context_tracking:
> Take IRQ eqs entrypoints over RCU"), it appears that the following diff
> is the proper fix up. Would you mind applying it to the merge of
> whichever tree comes second if possible? I did build and boot test it
> but it would not be a bad idea for Sami and Frederic to verify that it
> is correct so that Kees/Paul can mention it to Linus :)
Actually, the CFI fix (and a few others) are meant to be sent for
-rc3, so if the ct_irq_enter() change is in -next, this can maybe get
sorted out?
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-15 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-15 19:55 Contextual conflict between kspp and rcu trees Nathan Chancellor
2022-06-15 20:25 ` Kees Cook
2022-06-15 20:28 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-06-15 20:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-15 20:35 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-06-15 21:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-15 23:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-15 20:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-15 23:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-16 1:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-16 1:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202206151326.E34CDE453@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.