All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: bound maximum wait time for inodegc work
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 08:04:15 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220615220416.3681870-2-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220615220416.3681870-1-david@fromorbit.com>

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

Currently inodegc work can sit queued on the per-cpu queue until
the workqueue is either flushed of the queue reaches a depth that
triggers work queuing (and later throttling). This means that we
could queue work that waits for a long time for some other event to
trigger flushing.

Hence instead of just queueing work at a specific depth, use a
delayed work that queues the work at a bound time. We can still
schedule the work immediately at a given depth, but we no long need
to worry about leaving a number of items on the list that won't get
processed until external events prevail.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h  |  2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_super.c  |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
index 374b3bafaeb0..46b30ecf498c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ xfs_inodegc_queue_all(
 	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
 		gc = per_cpu_ptr(mp->m_inodegc, cpu);
 		if (!llist_empty(&gc->list))
-			queue_work_on(cpu, mp->m_inodegc_wq, &gc->work);
+			mod_delayed_work_on(cpu, mp->m_inodegc_wq, &gc->work, 0);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1844,8 +1844,8 @@ void
 xfs_inodegc_worker(
 	struct work_struct	*work)
 {
-	struct xfs_inodegc	*gc = container_of(work, struct xfs_inodegc,
-							work);
+	struct xfs_inodegc	*gc = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
+						struct xfs_inodegc, work);
 	struct llist_node	*node = llist_del_all(&gc->list);
 	struct xfs_inode	*ip, *n;
 
@@ -2017,6 +2017,7 @@ xfs_inodegc_queue(
 	struct xfs_inodegc	*gc;
 	int			items;
 	unsigned int		shrinker_hits;
+	unsigned long		queue_delay = 1;
 
 	trace_xfs_inode_set_need_inactive(ip);
 	spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
@@ -2028,19 +2029,26 @@ xfs_inodegc_queue(
 	items = READ_ONCE(gc->items);
 	WRITE_ONCE(gc->items, items + 1);
 	shrinker_hits = READ_ONCE(gc->shrinker_hits);
-	put_cpu_ptr(gc);
 
-	if (!xfs_is_inodegc_enabled(mp))
+	/*
+	 * We queue the work while holding the current CPU so that the work
+	 * is scheduled to run on this CPU.
+	 */
+	if (!xfs_is_inodegc_enabled(mp)) {
+		put_cpu_ptr(gc);
 		return;
-
-	if (xfs_inodegc_want_queue_work(ip, items)) {
-		trace_xfs_inodegc_queue(mp, __return_address);
-		queue_work(mp->m_inodegc_wq, &gc->work);
 	}
 
+	if (xfs_inodegc_want_queue_work(ip, items))
+		queue_delay = 0;
+
+	trace_xfs_inodegc_queue(mp, __return_address);
+	mod_delayed_work(mp->m_inodegc_wq, &gc->work, queue_delay);
+	put_cpu_ptr(gc);
+
 	if (xfs_inodegc_want_flush_work(ip, items, shrinker_hits)) {
 		trace_xfs_inodegc_throttle(mp, __return_address);
-		flush_work(&gc->work);
+		flush_delayed_work(&gc->work);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -2057,7 +2065,7 @@ xfs_inodegc_cpu_dead(
 	unsigned int		count = 0;
 
 	dead_gc = per_cpu_ptr(mp->m_inodegc, dead_cpu);
-	cancel_work_sync(&dead_gc->work);
+	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dead_gc->work);
 
 	if (llist_empty(&dead_gc->list))
 		return;
@@ -2076,12 +2084,12 @@ xfs_inodegc_cpu_dead(
 	llist_add_batch(first, last, &gc->list);
 	count += READ_ONCE(gc->items);
 	WRITE_ONCE(gc->items, count);
-	put_cpu_ptr(gc);
 
 	if (xfs_is_inodegc_enabled(mp)) {
 		trace_xfs_inodegc_queue(mp, __return_address);
-		queue_work(mp->m_inodegc_wq, &gc->work);
+		mod_delayed_work(mp->m_inodegc_wq, &gc->work, 0);
 	}
+	put_cpu_ptr(gc);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2176,7 +2184,7 @@ xfs_inodegc_shrinker_scan(
 			unsigned int	h = READ_ONCE(gc->shrinker_hits);
 
 			WRITE_ONCE(gc->shrinker_hits, h + 1);
-			queue_work_on(cpu, mp->m_inodegc_wq, &gc->work);
+			mod_delayed_work_on(cpu, mp->m_inodegc_wq, &gc->work, 0);
 			no_items = false;
 		}
 	}
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
index ba5d42abf66e..d2eaebd85abf 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ struct xfs_error_cfg {
  */
 struct xfs_inodegc {
 	struct llist_head	list;
-	struct work_struct	work;
+	struct delayed_work	work;
 
 	/* approximate count of inodes in the list */
 	unsigned int		items;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
index 48a7239ed1b2..651ae75a7e23 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
@@ -1075,7 +1075,7 @@ xfs_inodegc_init_percpu(
 		gc = per_cpu_ptr(mp->m_inodegc, cpu);
 		init_llist_head(&gc->list);
 		gc->items = 0;
-		INIT_WORK(&gc->work, xfs_inodegc_worker);
+		INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&gc->work, xfs_inodegc_worker);
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.35.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-15 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-15 22:04 [PATCH 0/2 V2] xfs: xfs: non-blocking inodegc pushes Dave Chinner
2022-06-15 22:04 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2022-06-17 16:34   ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: bound maximum wait time for inodegc work Brian Foster
2022-06-17 21:52     ` Dave Chinner
2022-06-22  5:20       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-22 16:13         ` Brian Foster
2022-06-23  0:25           ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-23 11:49             ` Brian Foster
2022-06-23 19:56               ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-24 12:39                 ` Brian Foster
2022-06-25  1:03                   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-06-15 22:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: introduce xfs_inodegc_push() Dave Chinner
2022-06-22  5:21   ` Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-24  6:38 [RFC PATCH 0/2] xfs: non-blocking inodegc pushes Dave Chinner
2022-05-24  6:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: bound maximum wait time for inodegc work Dave Chinner
2022-05-24 16:54   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-24 23:03     ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220615220416.3681870-2-david@fromorbit.com \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.