From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: "Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>,
"Yoshihiro Shimoda" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
"Liang He" <windhl@126.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: rcar: Resolve of_find_matching_node() reference leak
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 06:05:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220622110542.GA1372130@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUwGLDzOQo_wwSLmzBnJXe-cOw=nqsPbFLsj-c+nHfy_w@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 09:45:49AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 4:57 AM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> >
> > Previously, rcar_pcie_init() used of_find_matching_node() to search the
> > entire device tree for compatible strings for which we need to install an
> > abort handler. If we found one, we got a device_node with refcount
> > incremented, but we discarded the pointer and never released that
> > reference.
> >
> > Extend the struct rcar_variant to indicate whether each variant requires an
> > abort handler. Install the handler in rcar_pcie_probe() when needed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > Cc: Liang He <windhl@126.com>
> > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar-host.c
>
> > @@ -964,12 +965,35 @@ static int rcar_pcie_parse_map_dma_ranges(struct rcar_pcie_host *host)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> > +static int rcar_pcie_aarch32_abort_handler(unsigned long addr,
> > + unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > + return !fixup_exception(regs);
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +static void rcar_pcie_hook_aborts(void)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE
> > + hook_fault_code(17, rcar_pcie_aarch32_abort_handler, SIGBUS, 0,
> > + "asynchronous external abort");
> > +#else
> > + hook_fault_code(22, rcar_pcie_aarch32_abort_handler, SIGBUS, 0,
> > + "imprecise external abort");
> > +#endif
> > +#endif
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct rcar_variant rcar_h1_data = {
> > .phy_init_fn = rcar_pcie_phy_init_h1,
> > + .hook_aborts = true,
> > };
> >
> > static const struct rcar_variant rcar_gen2_data = {
> > .phy_init_fn = rcar_pcie_phy_init_gen2,
> > + .hook_aborts = true,
> > };
> >
> > static const struct rcar_variant rcar_gen3_data = {
> > @@ -1035,6 +1059,9 @@ static int rcar_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > goto err_clk_disable;
> > }
> >
> > + if (host->variant->hook_aborts)
> > + rcar_pcie_hook_aborts();
>
> I was quite sure there was a good reason why this was not done in
> .probe() before...
>
> And indeed, the original submission[1] did have a comment explaining
> that:
>
> + /*
> + * Since probe() can be deferred we need to make sure that
> + * hook_fault_code is not called after __init memory is freed
> + * by kernel and since rcar_pcie_abort_handler() is a no-op,
> + * we can install the handler here without risking it
> + * accessing some uninitialized driver state.
> + */
>
> No idea why it was removed in v2 and later, but the point is:
> hook_fault_code() is __init, so you cannot call it from a deferred
> probe.
> And you should have got a section mismatch warning ;-)
Oooh, thanks for that! I missed the builtin_platform_driver_probe()
vs builtin_platform_driver() difference that explains why doing this
at probe-time works for pci-ixp4xx.c but not here.
Bjorn
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-22 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-22 2:57 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: rcar: Fix of_find_matching_node() reference leak Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-22 2:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: rcar: Add dev struct for of_device_get_match_data() Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-22 2:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: rcar: Resolve of_find_matching_node() reference leak Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-22 7:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-22 11:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220622110542.GA1372130@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=windhl@126.com \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.