From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@fb.com,
dan.carpenter@oracle.com
Cc: eddyz87@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: fix for use after free bug in inline_bpf_loop
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 05:06:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220624020613.548108-1-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
These two patches fix the use after free bug in inline_bpf_loop()
reported by Dan Carpenter. The fix for verifier.c and the test case in
test_verifier.c are split into separate commits.
While the first patch is necessary, I'm not sure about the second. The
test case is somewhat fragile because of the following line:
const int len = getpagesize() - 25;
Here 25 is a magical number that allows env->prog to fit in one page
before bpf_loop inlining and don't fit after the bpf_loop
inlining. I'd prefer to use sizeof(struct bpf_prog) instead of this
constant, but definition of the struct bpf_prog is not available in
test_verifier.c.
Eduard Zingerman (2):
bpf: fix for use after free bug in inline_bpf_loop
selftest/bpf: test for use after free bug fix in inline_bpf_loop
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c | 11 ++++++
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-06-24 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-24 2:06 Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2022-06-24 2:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: fix for use after free bug in inline_bpf_loop Eduard Zingerman
2022-06-24 2:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftest/bpf: test for use after free bug fix " Eduard Zingerman
2022-06-24 15:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: fix for use after free bug " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220624020613.548108-1-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.