All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, yuzhao@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
	nsaenzju@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com,
	m.szyprowski@samsung.com, minchan@kernel.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
	hughd@google.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-page_alloc-protect-pcp-lists-with-a-spinlock.patch added to mm-unstable branch
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:08:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220624190817.0C705C34114@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: mm/page_alloc: protect PCP lists with a spinlock
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     mm-page_alloc-protect-pcp-lists-with-a-spinlock.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-page_alloc-protect-pcp-lists-with-a-spinlock.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Subject: mm/page_alloc: protect PCP lists with a spinlock
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 13:54:21 +0100

Currently the PCP lists are protected by using local_lock_irqsave to
prevent migration and IRQ reentrancy but this is inconvenient.  Remote
draining of the lists is impossible and a workqueue is required and every
task allocation/free must disable then enable interrupts which is
expensive.

As preparation for dealing with both of those problems, protect the lists
with a spinlock.  The IRQ-unsafe version of the lock is used because IRQs
are already disabled by local_lock_irqsave.  spin_trylock is used in
preparation for a time when local_lock could be used instead of
lock_lock_irqsave.

The per_cpu_pages still fits within the same number of cache lines after
this patch relative to before the series.

struct per_cpu_pages {
        spinlock_t                 lock;                 /*     0     4 */
        int                        count;                /*     4     4 */
        int                        high;                 /*     8     4 */
        int                        batch;                /*    12     4 */
        short int                  free_factor;          /*    16     2 */
        short int                  expire;               /*    18     2 */

        /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */

        struct list_head           lists[13];            /*    24   208 */

        /* size: 256, cachelines: 4, members: 7 */
        /* sum members: 228, holes: 1, sum holes: 4 */
        /* padding: 24 */
} __attribute__((__aligned__(64)));

There is overhead in the fast path due to acquiring the spinlock even
though the spinlock is per-cpu and uncontended in the common case.  Page
Fault Test (PFT) running on a 1-socket reported the following results on a
1 socket machine.

                                     5.19.0-rc3               5.19.0-rc3
                                        vanilla      mm-pcpspinirq-v5r16
Hmean     faults/sec-1   869275.7381 (   0.00%)   874597.5167 *   0.61%*
Hmean     faults/sec-3  2370266.6681 (   0.00%)  2379802.0362 *   0.40%*
Hmean     faults/sec-5  2701099.7019 (   0.00%)  2664889.7003 *  -1.34%*
Hmean     faults/sec-7  3517170.9157 (   0.00%)  3491122.8242 *  -0.74%*
Hmean     faults/sec-8  3965729.6187 (   0.00%)  3939727.0243 *  -0.66%*

There is a small hit in the number of faults per second but given that the
results are more stable, it's borderline noise.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220624125423.6126-6-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 include/linux/mmzone.h |    1 
 mm/page_alloc.c        |  118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h~mm-page_alloc-protect-pcp-lists-with-a-spinlock
+++ a/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ enum zone_watermarks {
 
 /* Fields and list protected by pagesets local_lock in page_alloc.c */
 struct per_cpu_pages {
+	spinlock_t lock;	/* Protects lists field */
 	int count;		/* number of pages in the list */
 	int high;		/* high watermark, emptying needed */
 	int batch;		/* chunk size for buddy add/remove */
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_alloc-protect-pcp-lists-with-a-spinlock
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -133,6 +133,20 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagesets, p
 	.lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock),
 };
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
+/*
+ * On SMP, spin_trylock is sufficient protection.
+ * On PREEMPT_RT, spin_trylock is equivalent on both SMP and UP.
+ */
+#define pcp_trylock_prepare(flags)	do { } while (0)
+#define pcp_trylock_finish(flag)	do { } while (0)
+#else
+
+/* UP spin_trylock always succeeds so disable IRQs to prevent re-entrancy. */
+#define pcp_trylock_prepare(flags)	local_irq_save(flags)
+#define pcp_trylock_finish(flags)	local_irq_restore(flags)
+#endif
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, numa_node);
 EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(numa_node);
@@ -3101,15 +3115,22 @@ static int rmqueue_bulk(struct zone *zon
  */
 void drain_zone_pages(struct zone *zone, struct per_cpu_pages *pcp)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
 	int to_drain, batch;
 
-	local_lock_irqsave(&pagesets.lock, flags);
 	batch = READ_ONCE(pcp->batch);
 	to_drain = min(pcp->count, batch);
-	if (to_drain > 0)
+	if (to_drain > 0) {
+		unsigned long flags;
+
+		/*
+		 * free_pcppages_bulk expects IRQs disabled for zone->lock
+		 * so even though pcp->lock is not intended to be IRQ-safe,
+		 * it's needed in this context.
+		 */
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&pcp->lock, flags);
 		free_pcppages_bulk(zone, to_drain, pcp, 0);
-	local_unlock_irqrestore(&pagesets.lock, flags);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcp->lock, flags);
+	}
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -3122,16 +3143,17 @@ void drain_zone_pages(struct zone *zone,
  */
 static void drain_pages_zone(unsigned int cpu, struct zone *zone)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
 	struct per_cpu_pages *pcp;
 
-	local_lock_irqsave(&pagesets.lock, flags);
-
 	pcp = per_cpu_ptr(zone->per_cpu_pageset, cpu);
-	if (pcp->count)
-		free_pcppages_bulk(zone, pcp->count, pcp, 0);
+	if (pcp->count) {
+		unsigned long flags;
 
-	local_unlock_irqrestore(&pagesets.lock, flags);
+		/* See drain_zone_pages on why this is disabling IRQs */
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&pcp->lock, flags);
+		free_pcppages_bulk(zone, pcp->count, pcp, 0);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcp->lock, flags);
+	}
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3399,17 +3421,15 @@ static int nr_pcp_high(struct per_cpu_pa
 	return min(READ_ONCE(pcp->batch) << 2, high);
 }
 
-static void free_unref_page_commit(struct page *page, int migratetype,
+static void free_unref_page_commit(struct zone *zone, struct per_cpu_pages *pcp,
+				   struct page *page, int migratetype,
 				   unsigned int order)
 {
-	struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
-	struct per_cpu_pages *pcp;
 	int high;
 	int pindex;
 	bool free_high;
 
 	__count_vm_event(PGFREE);
-	pcp = this_cpu_ptr(zone->per_cpu_pageset);
 	pindex = order_to_pindex(migratetype, order);
 	list_add(&page->pcp_list, &pcp->lists[pindex]);
 	pcp->count += 1 << order;
@@ -3436,6 +3456,9 @@ static void free_unref_page_commit(struc
 void free_unref_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned long __maybe_unused UP_flags;
+	struct per_cpu_pages *pcp;
+	struct zone *zone;
 	unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
 	int migratetype;
 
@@ -3459,7 +3482,16 @@ void free_unref_page(struct page *page,
 	}
 
 	local_lock_irqsave(&pagesets.lock, flags);
-	free_unref_page_commit(page, migratetype, order);
+	zone = page_zone(page);
+	pcp_trylock_prepare(UP_flags);
+	pcp = this_cpu_ptr(zone->per_cpu_pageset);
+	if (spin_trylock(&pcp->lock)) {
+		free_unref_page_commit(zone, pcp, page, migratetype, order);
+		spin_unlock(&pcp->lock);
+	} else {
+		free_one_page(zone, page, pfn, order, migratetype, FPI_NONE);
+	}
+	pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
 	local_unlock_irqrestore(&pagesets.lock, flags);
 }
 
@@ -3469,6 +3501,8 @@ void free_unref_page(struct page *page,
 void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
 {
 	struct page *page, *next;
+	struct per_cpu_pages *pcp = NULL;
+	struct zone *locked_zone = NULL;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int batch_count = 0;
 	int migratetype;
@@ -3495,6 +3529,17 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_he
 
 	local_lock_irqsave(&pagesets.lock, flags);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(page, next, list, lru) {
+		struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
+
+		/* Different zone, different pcp lock. */
+		if (zone != locked_zone) {
+			if (pcp)
+				spin_unlock(&pcp->lock);
+			locked_zone = zone;
+			pcp = this_cpu_ptr(zone->per_cpu_pageset);
+			spin_lock(&pcp->lock);
+		}
+
 		/*
 		 * Non-isolated types over MIGRATE_PCPTYPES get added
 		 * to the MIGRATE_MOVABLE pcp list.
@@ -3504,18 +3549,24 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_he
 			migratetype = MIGRATE_MOVABLE;
 
 		trace_mm_page_free_batched(page);
-		free_unref_page_commit(page, migratetype, 0);
+		free_unref_page_commit(zone, pcp, page, migratetype, 0);
 
 		/*
 		 * Guard against excessive IRQ disabled times when we get
 		 * a large list of pages to free.
 		 */
 		if (++batch_count == SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) {
+			spin_unlock(&pcp->lock);
 			local_unlock_irqrestore(&pagesets.lock, flags);
 			batch_count = 0;
 			local_lock_irqsave(&pagesets.lock, flags);
+			pcp = this_cpu_ptr(locked_zone->per_cpu_pageset);
+			spin_lock(&pcp->lock);
 		}
 	}
+
+	if (pcp)
+		spin_unlock(&pcp->lock);
 	local_unlock_irqrestore(&pagesets.lock, flags);
 }
 
@@ -3729,18 +3780,31 @@ static struct page *rmqueue_pcplist(stru
 	struct list_head *list;
 	struct page *page;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned long __maybe_unused UP_flags;
 
 	local_lock_irqsave(&pagesets.lock, flags);
 
 	/*
+	 * spin_trylock may fail due to a parallel drain. In the future, the
+	 * trylock will also protect against IRQ reentrancy.
+	 */
+	pcp = this_cpu_ptr(zone->per_cpu_pageset);
+	pcp_trylock_prepare(UP_flags);
+	if (!spin_trylock(&pcp->lock)) {
+		pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	/*
 	 * On allocation, reduce the number of pages that are batch freed.
 	 * See nr_pcp_free() where free_factor is increased for subsequent
 	 * frees.
 	 */
-	pcp = this_cpu_ptr(zone->per_cpu_pageset);
 	pcp->free_factor >>= 1;
 	list = &pcp->lists[order_to_pindex(migratetype, order)];
 	page = __rmqueue_pcplist(zone, order, migratetype, alloc_flags, pcp, list);
+	spin_unlock(&pcp->lock);
+	pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
 	local_unlock_irqrestore(&pagesets.lock, flags);
 	if (page) {
 		__count_zid_vm_events(PGALLOC, page_zonenum(page), 1);
@@ -3775,7 +3839,8 @@ struct page *rmqueue(struct zone *prefer
 				migratetype != MIGRATE_MOVABLE) {
 			page = rmqueue_pcplist(preferred_zone, zone, order,
 					gfp_flags, migratetype, alloc_flags);
-			goto out;
+			if (likely(page))
+				goto out;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -5252,6 +5317,7 @@ unsigned long __alloc_pages_bulk(gfp_t g
 {
 	struct page *page;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned long __maybe_unused UP_flags;
 	struct zone *zone;
 	struct zoneref *z;
 	struct per_cpu_pages *pcp;
@@ -5332,11 +5398,15 @@ unsigned long __alloc_pages_bulk(gfp_t g
 	if (unlikely(!zone))
 		goto failed;
 
-	/* Attempt the batch allocation */
+	/* Is a parallel drain in progress? */
 	local_lock_irqsave(&pagesets.lock, flags);
+	pcp_trylock_prepare(UP_flags);
 	pcp = this_cpu_ptr(zone->per_cpu_pageset);
-	pcp_list = &pcp->lists[order_to_pindex(ac.migratetype, 0)];
+	if (!spin_trylock(&pcp->lock))
+		goto failed_irq;
 
+	/* Attempt the batch allocation */
+	pcp_list = &pcp->lists[order_to_pindex(ac.migratetype, 0)];
 	while (nr_populated < nr_pages) {
 
 		/* Skip existing pages */
@@ -5349,8 +5419,10 @@ unsigned long __alloc_pages_bulk(gfp_t g
 								pcp, pcp_list);
 		if (unlikely(!page)) {
 			/* Try and allocate at least one page */
-			if (!nr_account)
+			if (!nr_account) {
+				spin_unlock(&pcp->lock);
 				goto failed_irq;
+			}
 			break;
 		}
 		nr_account++;
@@ -5363,6 +5435,8 @@ unsigned long __alloc_pages_bulk(gfp_t g
 		nr_populated++;
 	}
 
+	spin_unlock(&pcp->lock);
+	pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
 	local_unlock_irqrestore(&pagesets.lock, flags);
 
 	__count_zid_vm_events(PGALLOC, zone_idx(zone), nr_account);
@@ -5372,6 +5446,7 @@ out:
 	return nr_populated;
 
 failed_irq:
+	pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
 	local_unlock_irqrestore(&pagesets.lock, flags);
 
 failed:
@@ -7017,6 +7092,7 @@ static void per_cpu_pages_init(struct pe
 	memset(pcp, 0, sizeof(*pcp));
 	memset(pzstats, 0, sizeof(*pzstats));
 
+	spin_lock_init(&pcp->lock);
 	for (pindex = 0; pindex < NR_PCP_LISTS; pindex++)
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcp->lists[pindex]);
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from mgorman@techsingularity.net are

mm-page_alloc-add-page-buddy_list-and-page-pcp_list.patch
mm-page_alloc-use-only-one-pcp-list-for-thp-sized-allocations.patch
mm-page_alloc-split-out-buddy-removal-code-from-rmqueue-into-separate-helper.patch
mm-page_alloc-remove-mistaken-page-==-null-check-in-rmqueue.patch
mm-page_alloc-protect-pcp-lists-with-a-spinlock.patch
mm-page_alloc-replace-local_lock-with-normal-spinlock.patch


             reply	other threads:[~2022-06-24 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-24 19:08 Andrew Morton [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-06-13 16:54 + mm-page_alloc-protect-pcp-lists-with-a-spinlock.patch added to mm-unstable branch Andrew Morton
2022-05-12 19:44 Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220624190817.0C705C34114@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=nsaenzju@redhat.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.