All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@gmail.com>, jmaloy@redhat.com, ying.xue@windriver.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: tipc: fix possible infoleak in tipc_mon_rcv()
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 08:27:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220630082718.7df33430@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <665de056-6ec1-e4e1-adf9-4df3e35628b7@gmail.com>

On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 17:19:21 +0800 Hangyu Hua wrote:
> On 2022/6/30 11:31, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 16:31:22 +0800 Hangyu Hua wrote:  
> >> dom_bef is use to cache current domain record only if current domain
> >> exists. But when current domain does not exist, dom_bef will still be used
> >> in mon_identify_lost_members. This may lead to an information leak.  
> > 
> > AFAICT applied_bef must be zero if peer->domain was 0, so I don't think
> > mon_identify_lost_members() will do anything.
> >   
> 
> void tipc_mon_rcv(struct net *net, void *data, u16 dlen, u32 addr,
> 		  struct tipc_mon_state *state, int bearer_id)
> {
> ...
> 	if (!dom || (dom->len < new_dlen)) {
> 		kfree(dom);
> 		dom = kmalloc(new_dlen, GFP_ATOMIC);	<--- [1]
> 		peer->domain = dom;
> 		if (!dom)
> 			goto exit;
> 	}
> ...
> }
> 
> peer->domain will be NULL when [1] fails. But there will not change 
> peer->applied to 0. In this case, if tipc_mon_rcv is called again then 
> an information leak will happen.

I see, good analysis! Jon, Xue - is there a reason domain gets wiped
on memory allocation failure? I'd think we should leave the previous
pointer in place instead of freeing it first.

      reply	other threads:[~2022-06-30 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-28  8:31 [PATCH v2] net: tipc: fix possible infoleak in tipc_mon_rcv() Hangyu Hua
2022-06-28 10:28 ` Tung Quang Nguyen
2022-06-30  3:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-30  9:19   ` Hangyu Hua
2022-06-30 15:27     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220630082718.7df33430@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hbh25y@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au \
    --cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.