Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 02:56:16PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 14:40:13 +0200
> Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr> wrote:
> 
> > Le 30/06/2022 à 14:23, Igor Mammedov a écrit :
> > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:36:47 +0200
> > > Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr> wrote:
> > >  
> > >> Allow -numa without initiator value when hmat=on so that we may
> > >> build more complex topologies, e.g. NUMA nodes whose best initiators
> > >> are not just another single node.
> > >>  
> > > patches looks fine code-wise,
> > > however something wrong with them, i.e. 'git am' doesn't like them
> > > nor ./scripts/checkpatch (which one should use before sending patches).
> > >
> > > I've checked it's not my mail server/client issue(or whatever)
> > > that corrupts them (ones downloaded from patchew are broken as well)  
> > 
> > 
> > I don't know what's going on. These 4 patches are in 
> > https://github.com/bgoglin/qemu/commits/hmat-noinitiator (rebased on 
> > master 10mn ago).
> 
> I'm not sure if we take patches from directly from git-forges,
> I guess it's upto maintainers.
> 
> CCing Michael,
>  since these should go through his tree

I could if nothing else worked, but I would much rather get
patches that did get processed by patchew and other automated
mail based tools.


> > 
> > Do whatever you want with them. I am not allowed to spend more time on this.
> > 
> > Brice
> > 
> > 
> >