From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>, Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@huawei.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
jvgediya.oss@gmail.com,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 08/12] mm/demotion: Add pg_data_t member to track node memory tier details
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 12:36:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220704070612.299585-9-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220704070612.299585-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Also update different helpes to use NODE_DATA()->memtier. Since
node specific memtier can change based on the reassignment of
NUMA node to a different memory tiers, accessing NODE_DATA()->memtier
needs to happen under an rcu read lock or memory_tier_lock.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/memory-tiers.h | 11 ++++
include/linux/mmzone.h | 3 +
mm/memory-tiers.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
index 453f6e5d357c..705b63ee31d5 100644
--- a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
+++ b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
@@ -6,6 +6,9 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/nodemask.h>
+
#define MEMORY_TIER_HBM_GPU 300
#define MEMORY_TIER_DRAM 200
#define MEMORY_TIER_PMEM 100
@@ -13,6 +16,12 @@
#define DEFAULT_MEMORY_TIER MEMORY_TIER_DRAM
#define MAX_MEMORY_TIER_ID 400
+struct memory_tier {
+ struct list_head list;
+ struct device dev;
+ nodemask_t nodelist;
+};
+
extern bool numa_demotion_enabled;
int node_create_and_set_memory_tier(int node, int tier);
#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
@@ -25,6 +34,8 @@ static inline int next_demotion_node(int node)
#endif
int node_get_memory_tier_id(int node);
int node_update_memory_tier(int node, int tier);
+struct memory_tier *node_get_memory_tier(int node);
+void node_put_memory_tier(struct memory_tier *memtier);
#else
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index aab70355d64f..353812495a70 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -928,6 +928,9 @@ typedef struct pglist_data {
/* Per-node vmstats */
struct per_cpu_nodestat __percpu *per_cpu_nodestats;
atomic_long_t vm_stat[NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS];
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+ struct memory_tier __rcu *memtier;
+#endif
} pg_data_t;
#define node_present_pages(nid) (NODE_DATA(nid)->node_present_pages)
diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
index b7cb368cb9c0..6a2476faf13a 100644
--- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
+++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
@@ -1,22 +1,15 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include <linux/types.h>
-#include <linux/device.h>
-#include <linux/nodemask.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/lockdep.h>
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
#include <linux/memory.h>
#include <linux/random.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/memory-tiers.h>
#include "internal.h"
-struct memory_tier {
- struct list_head list;
- struct device dev;
- nodemask_t nodelist;
-};
-
struct demotion_nodes {
nodemask_t preferred;
};
@@ -120,7 +113,7 @@ static void memory_tier_device_release(struct device *dev)
{
struct memory_tier *tier = to_memory_tier(dev);
- kfree(tier);
+ kfree_rcu(tier);
}
static void insert_memory_tier(struct memory_tier *memtier)
@@ -176,13 +169,18 @@ static void unregister_memory_tier(struct memory_tier *memtier)
static struct memory_tier *__node_get_memory_tier(int node)
{
- struct memory_tier *memtier;
+ pg_data_t *pgdat;
- list_for_each_entry(memtier, &memory_tiers, list) {
- if (node_isset(node, memtier->nodelist))
- return memtier;
- }
- return NULL;
+ pgdat = NODE_DATA(node);
+ if (!pgdat)
+ return NULL;
+ /*
+ * Since we hold memory_tier_lock, we can avoid
+ * RCU read locks when accessing the details. No
+ * parallel updates are possible here.
+ */
+ return rcu_dereference_check(pgdat->memtier,
+ lockdep_is_held(&memory_tier_lock));
}
static struct memory_tier *__get_memory_tier_from_id(int id)
@@ -196,6 +194,33 @@ static struct memory_tier *__get_memory_tier_from_id(int id)
return NULL;
}
+/*
+ * Called with memory_tier_lock. Hence the device references cannot
+ * be dropped during this function.
+ */
+static void memtier_node_set(int node, struct memory_tier *memtier)
+{
+ pg_data_t *pgdat;
+ struct memory_tier *current_memtier;
+
+ pgdat = NODE_DATA(node);
+ if (!pgdat)
+ return;
+ /*
+ * Make sure we mark the memtier NULL before we assign the new memory tier
+ * to the NUMA node. This make sure that anybody looking at NODE_DATA
+ * finds a NULL memtier or the one which is still valid.
+ */
+ current_memtier = rcu_dereference_check(pgdat->memtier,
+ lockdep_is_held(&memory_tier_lock));
+ rcu_assign_pointer(pgdat->memtier, NULL);
+ if (current_memtier)
+ node_clear(node, current_memtier->nodelist);
+ synchronize_rcu();
+ node_set(node, memtier->nodelist);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(pgdat->memtier, memtier);
+}
+
static int __node_create_and_set_memory_tier(int node, int tier)
{
int ret = 0;
@@ -209,7 +234,7 @@ static int __node_create_and_set_memory_tier(int node, int tier)
goto out;
}
}
- node_set(node, memtier->nodelist);
+ memtier_node_set(node, memtier);
out:
return ret;
}
@@ -231,14 +256,7 @@ int node_create_and_set_memory_tier(int node, int tier)
if (current_tier->dev.id == tier)
goto out;
- node_clear(node, current_tier->nodelist);
-
ret = __node_create_and_set_memory_tier(node, tier);
- if (ret) {
- /* reset it back to older tier */
- node_set(node, current_tier->nodelist);
- goto out;
- }
if (nodes_empty(current_tier->nodelist))
unregister_memory_tier(current_tier);
@@ -260,7 +278,7 @@ static int __node_set_memory_tier(int node, int tier)
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
- node_set(node, memtier->nodelist);
+ memtier_node_set(node, memtier);
out:
return ret;
}
@@ -316,10 +334,7 @@ int node_update_memory_tier(int node, int tier)
if (!current_tier || current_tier->dev.id == tier)
goto out;
- node_clear(node, current_tier->nodelist);
-
ret = __node_create_and_set_memory_tier(node, tier);
-
if (nodes_empty(current_tier->nodelist))
unregister_memory_tier(current_tier);
@@ -330,6 +345,34 @@ int node_update_memory_tier(int node, int tier)
return ret;
}
+/*
+ * lockless access to memory tier of a NUMA node.
+ */
+struct memory_tier *node_get_memory_tier(int node)
+{
+ pg_data_t *pgdat;
+ struct memory_tier *memtier;
+
+ pgdat = NODE_DATA(node);
+ if (!pgdat)
+ return NULL;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ memtier = rcu_dereference(pgdat->memtier);
+ if (!memtier)
+ goto out;
+
+ get_device(&memtier->dev);
+out:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return memtier;
+}
+
+void node_put_memory_tier(struct memory_tier *memtier)
+{
+ put_device(&memtier->dev);
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
/**
* next_demotion_node() - Get the next node in the demotion path
@@ -546,7 +589,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group *memory_tier_attr_groups[] = {
static int __init memory_tier_init(void)
{
- int ret;
+ int ret, node;
struct memory_tier *memtier;
ret = subsys_system_register(&memory_tier_subsys, memory_tier_attr_groups);
@@ -567,7 +610,10 @@ static int __init memory_tier_init(void)
__func__, PTR_ERR(memtier));
/* CPU only nodes are not part of memory tiers. */
- memtier->nodelist = node_states[N_MEMORY];
+ for_each_node_state(node, N_MEMORY) {
+ rcu_assign_pointer(NODE_DATA(node)->memtier, memtier);
+ node_set(node, memtier->nodelist);
+ }
mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock);
migrate_on_reclaim_init();
--
2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-04 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-04 7:06 [PATCH v8 00/12] mm/demotion: Memory tiers and demotion Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-04 7:06 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] mm/demotion: Add support for explicit memory tiers Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-04 7:06 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] mm/demotion: Move memory demotion related code Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-04 7:06 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] mm/demotion/dax/kmem: Set node's memory tier to MEMORY_TIER_PMEM Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-04 7:06 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] mm/demotion: Add hotplug callbacks to handle new numa node onlined Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-04 7:06 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] mm/demotion: Build demotion targets based on explicit memory tiers Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-04 7:06 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] mm/demotion: Expose memory tier details via sysfs Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-04 7:06 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] mm/demotion: Add per node memory tier attribute to sysfs Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-04 7:06 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2022-07-04 7:06 ` [PATCH v8 09/12] mm/demotion: Demote pages according to allocation fallback order Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-04 7:06 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] mm/demotion: Update node_is_toptier to work with memory tiers Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-04 7:06 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] mm/demotion: Add documentation for memory tiering Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-04 7:06 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] mm/demotion: Add sysfs ABI documentation Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-04 15:00 ` [PATCH v8 00/12] mm/demotion: Memory tiers and demotion Matthew Wilcox
2022-07-05 3:45 ` Alistair Popple
2022-07-05 4:17 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-07-05 4:29 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-05 5:22 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-07-12 1:16 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-12 4:42 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-07-12 5:09 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-07-12 18:02 ` Yang Shi
2022-07-13 3:42 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-13 6:38 ` Wei Xu
2022-07-13 6:39 ` Wei Xu
2022-07-13 7:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-07-13 8:20 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-12 6:59 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-12 7:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-07-12 8:48 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-12 9:17 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-07-13 2:59 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-13 6:46 ` Wei Xu
2022-07-13 8:17 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-19 14:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-07-25 6:02 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-13 9:44 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-13 9:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-07-14 4:56 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-14 5:29 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-07-14 7:21 ` Huang, Ying
2022-07-11 15:29 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220704070612.299585-9-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hesham.almatary@huawei.com \
--cc=jvgediya.oss@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.