Re: [PATCH 1/8] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa

[Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>]

On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 11:44:29 +0100
Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@huawei.com> wrote:

> From: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
> 
> The "Memory Proximity Domain Attributes" structure of the ACPI HMAT
> has a "Processor Proximity Domain Valid" flag that is currently
> always set because Qemu -numa requires an initiator=X value
> when hmat=on. Unsetting this flag allows to create more complex
> memory topologies by having multiple best initiators for a single
> memory target.
> 
> This patch allows -numa without initiator=X when hmat=on by keeping
> the default value MAX_NODES in numa_state->nodes[i].initiator.
> All places reading numa_state->nodes[i].initiator already check
> whether it's different from MAX_NODES before using it.
[...]
> 

> Signed-off-by: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
when re-posting patches from someone else, I think one is supposed to add
his/her own SoB at the end


> ---
>  hw/core/machine.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
> index a673302cce..d4d7e77401 100644
> --- a/hw/core/machine.c
> +++ b/hw/core/machine.c
> @@ -1173,9 +1173,7 @@ static void numa_validate_initiator(NumaState *numa_state)
>  
>      for (i = 0; i < numa_state->num_nodes; i++) {
>          if (numa_info[i].initiator == MAX_NODES) {
> -            error_report("The initiator of NUMA node %d is missing, use "
> -                         "'-numa node,initiator' option to declare it", i);
> -            exit(1);
> +            continue;
>          }
>  
>          if (!numa_info[numa_info[i].initiator].present) {