From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF1A5C43334 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 08:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5829261156; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 08:27:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 5829261156 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R_5bq3S4jw13; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 08:27:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C6460B2E; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 08:27:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 60C6460B2E Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DA01BF4D7 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 08:27:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FDC818CD for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 08:27:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org B1FDC818CD X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iCWqdxeQ1lNE for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 08:27:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org E033A8188B Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net (relay10.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::230]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E033A8188B for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 08:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22DFB24000B; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 08:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:27:24 +0200 To: Joel Stanley Message-ID: <20220719102724.6adf0242@windsurf> In-Reply-To: References: <20220708142150.234611-1-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> <20220718141453.23c89337@windsurf> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1658219247; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+U0OAyRV8rTB6JPvI7V0zncyeCK2ZDANXmRJg8bphXM=; b=IOEPD7zXZmQyfIhQm6wtYvf4Z1vpkQtdo0GmxN/IWi//N15WK447kGZS1wEa+mOYHG38pq MWHOyWkrGHbha8978vXqFON7YKbJC7kqswHgnHoUNrd2Yn01PbF6rt0PpQ3PIzte7ARUha fhW1xiYaJsOKhMB/wdvpEYH7e5SxiQ0/lyymXj4cvMh2pA25M0tRP6IuseZWUfv5yCt0j8 UXEmPyVcXvtu3qrJTf3aeuCZ/aOOa6yAJaAwQwNivxDjt7GJweo2ckh4w+gvAaWu/jrYq+ 2O25ntFOYpQuJ/BslShP58ziXiGk3/1Kv0Q7+DJDLc8UkStUEm1vYZCG/squ/A== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=IOEPD7zX Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/pixman: fix powerpc64le build X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Bernd Kuhls , =?UTF-8?B?Q8OpZHJpYw==?= Le Goater , Buildroot Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello Joel, On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 07:46:03 +0000 Joel Stanley wrote: > There's a few build failures going around due to nonsense > configurations. In most cases the config has BR2_powerpc64le=y without > selecting a CPU. "Not selecting a CPU" is not possible. There is always a CPU within the: choice prompt "Target Architecture Variant" default BR2_generic_powerpc help Specific CPU variant to use ... endchoice that will be selected. However... > This defaults us to BR2_powerpc_970=y, which is a CPU > that isn't supported to run ppc64le. ... it seems like some of them are selectable on ppc64le, even though they do not make sense. > The fix is to only allow CPUs that support ppc64le to be configured > for that platform. I've prepared some patches that I'm running though > CI now, and I'll send them out once they're tested. Excellent! Looking forward to it! > If my changes don't fix this pixman issue then we can use the > BR2_POWERPC_CPU_HAS_ALTIVEC to force AltiVec/VMX off when we know the > CPU does not support it. But there's still a weird thing going on: pixman has a configure.ac check that compiles a small test program to verify if VMX support is available... and it concludes it is, but the actual pixman code then fails to build. Thanks for your feedback! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot