From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Andrey Strachuk <strochuk@ispras.ru>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ldv-project@linuxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: remove useless comparisons in acpi_pci_link_check_possible(), acpi_pci_link_check_current()
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 15:46:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220719204632.GA1562909@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220719095950.5420-1-strochuk@ispras.ru>
Since this only affects pci_link.c, I would update the subject to
match the style of previous commits:
ACPI/PCI: Remove useless NULL pointer checks
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:59:50PM +0300, Andrey Strachuk wrote:
> Local variable 'p' is initialized by an address
> of field of acpi_resource, so it does not make
> sense to compare 'p' with NULL.
Rewrap to fill 75 columns, which is the typical width of commit logs.
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Strachuk <strochuk@ispras.ru>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
I think you should drop this Fixes: tag because it's not useful.
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index 58647051c948..aa1038b8aec4 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_possible(struct acpi_resource *resource,
> case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ:
> {
> struct acpi_resource_irq *p = &resource->data.irq;
> - if (!p || !p->interrupt_count) {
> + if (!p->interrupt_count) {
> acpi_handle_debug(handle,
> "Blank _PRS IRQ resource\n");
> return AE_OK;
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_possible(struct acpi_resource *resource,
> {
> struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *p =
> &resource->data.extended_irq;
> - if (!p || !p->interrupt_count) {
> + if (!p->interrupt_count) {
> acpi_handle_debug(handle,
> "Blank _PRS EXT IRQ resource\n");
> return AE_OK;
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_current(struct acpi_resource *resource,
> case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ:
> {
> struct acpi_resource_irq *p = &resource->data.irq;
> - if (!p || !p->interrupt_count) {
> + if (!p->interrupt_count) {
> /*
> * IRQ descriptors may have no IRQ# bits set,
> * particularly those w/ _STA disabled
> @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_current(struct acpi_resource *resource,
> {
> struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *p =
> &resource->data.extended_irq;
> - if (!p || !p->interrupt_count) {
> + if (!p->interrupt_count) {
> /*
> * extended IRQ descriptors must
> * return at least 1 IRQ
> --
> 2.25.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-19 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-19 9:59 [PATCH] ACPI: remove useless comparisons in acpi_pci_link_check_possible(), acpi_pci_link_check_current() Andrey Strachuk
2022-07-19 20:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220719204632.GA1562909@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ldv-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=strochuk@ispras.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.