All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Vacek <dvacek@redhat.com>, Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] selftests/bpf: add destructive kfunc tests
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 13:46:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220720114652.3020467-4-asavkov@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220720114652.3020467-1-asavkov@redhat.com>

Add tests checking that programs calling destructive kfuncs can only do
so if they have BPF_F_DESTRUCTIVE flag set and CAP_SYS_BOOT
capabilities.

Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
---
 net/bpf/test_run.c                            | 12 +++++-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c     | 41 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/progs/kfunc_call_destructive.c        | 14 +++++++
 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_destructive.c

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 2ca96acbc50a0..dc267fa308f92 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -691,6 +691,10 @@ noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail2(u64 *mem, int len)
 {
 }
 
+noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_test_destructive(void)
+{
+}
+
 __diag_pop();
 
 ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(bpf_modify_return_test, ERRNO);
@@ -714,6 +718,7 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail3)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail1)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail2)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_destructive)
 BTF_SET_END(test_sk_check_kfunc_ids)
 
 BTF_SET_START(test_sk_acquire_kfunc_ids)
@@ -738,6 +743,10 @@ BTF_SET_START(test_sk_kptr_acquire_kfunc_ids)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get)
 BTF_SET_END(test_sk_kptr_acquire_kfunc_ids)
 
+BTF_SET_START(test_sk_destructive_kfunc_ids)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_destructive)
+BTF_SET_END(test_sk_destructive_kfunc_ids)
+
 static void *bpf_test_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 user_size,
 			   u32 size, u32 headroom, u32 tailroom)
 {
@@ -1622,7 +1631,8 @@ static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_prog_test_kfunc_set = {
 	.acquire_set      = &test_sk_acquire_kfunc_ids,
 	.release_set      = &test_sk_release_kfunc_ids,
 	.ret_null_set     = &test_sk_ret_null_kfunc_ids,
-	.kptr_acquire_set = &test_sk_kptr_acquire_kfunc_ids
+	.kptr_acquire_set = &test_sk_kptr_acquire_kfunc_ids,
+	.destructive_set  = &test_sk_destructive_kfunc_ids,
 };
 
 BTF_ID_LIST(bpf_prog_test_dtor_kfunc_ids)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
index c00eb974eb85e..1c2c4fdfba88b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
@@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
 #include "kfunc_call_test.lskel.h"
 #include "kfunc_call_test_subprog.skel.h"
 #include "kfunc_call_test_subprog.lskel.h"
+#include "kfunc_call_destructive.skel.h"
+
+#include "cap_helpers.h"
 
 static void test_main(void)
 {
@@ -86,6 +89,41 @@ static void test_subprog_lskel(void)
 	kfunc_call_test_subprog_lskel__destroy(skel);
 }
 
+static int test_destructive_open_and_load(int set_flag)
+{
+	struct kfunc_call_destructive *skel;
+	int err;
+
+	skel = kfunc_call_destructive__open();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "prog_open"))
+		return -1;
+
+	if (set_flag)
+		bpf_program__set_flags(skel->progs.kfunc_destructive_test,
+				bpf_program__flags(skel->progs.kfunc_destructive_test) | BPF_F_DESTRUCTIVE);
+
+	err = kfunc_call_destructive__load(skel);
+
+	kfunc_call_destructive__destroy(skel);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static void test_destructive(void)
+{
+	__u64 save_caps = 0;
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(test_destructive_open_and_load(0), -13, "no_flag_failure");
+	ASSERT_OK(test_destructive_open_and_load(1), "succesful_load");
+
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(cap_disable_effective(1ULL << CAP_SYS_BOOT, &save_caps), "drop_caps"))
+		return;
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(test_destructive_open_and_load(1), -13, "no_caps_failure");
+
+	cap_enable_effective(save_caps, NULL);
+}
+
 void test_kfunc_call(void)
 {
 	if (test__start_subtest("main"))
@@ -96,4 +134,7 @@ void test_kfunc_call(void)
 
 	if (test__start_subtest("subprog_lskel"))
 		test_subprog_lskel();
+
+	if (test__start_subtest("destructive"))
+		test_destructive();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_destructive.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_destructive.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..767472bc5a97b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_destructive.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_destructive(void) __ksym;
+
+SEC("tc")
+int kfunc_destructive_test(void)
+{
+	bpf_kfunc_call_test_destructive();
+	return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.35.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-20 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-20 11:46 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] destructive bpf kfuncs (was: bpf_panic) Artem Savkov
2022-07-20 11:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf: add BPF_F_DESTRUCTIVE flag for BPF_PROG_LOAD Artem Savkov
2022-07-21 14:02   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-07-22  4:18     ` Artem Savkov
2022-07-22  4:32       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-07-25  9:27         ` Artem Savkov
2022-07-25 19:23         ` Daniel Xu
2022-07-20 11:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] bpf: add destructive kfunc set Artem Savkov
2022-07-20 11:46 ` Artem Savkov [this message]
2022-07-20 11:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] bpf: export crash_kexec() as destructive kfunc Artem Savkov
2022-07-21 13:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] destructive bpf kfuncs (was: bpf_panic) Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220720114652.3020467-4-asavkov@redhat.com \
    --to=asavkov@redhat.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dvacek@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.