All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
	"Laurent Vivier" <laurent@vivier.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] hw/i386: pass RNG seed via setup_data entry
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 06:35:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220721062910-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220721100959.427518-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:09:59PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Tiny machines optimized for fast boot time generally don't use EFI,
> which means a random seed has to be supplied some other way. For this
> purpose, Linux (≥5.20) supports passing a seed in the setup_data table
> with SETUP_RNG_SEED, specially intended for hypervisors, kexec, and
> specialized bootloaders. The linked commit shows the upstream kernel
> implementation.
> 
> Link: https://git.kernel.org/tip/tip/c/68b8e9713c8
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>
> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> Cc: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
> ---
>  hw/i386/x86.c                                | 21 +++++++++++++++++---
>  include/standard-headers/asm-x86/bootparam.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/i386/x86.c b/hw/i386/x86.c
> index 6003b4b2df..284c97f158 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/x86.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/x86.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  #include "qemu/cutils.h"
>  #include "qemu/units.h"
>  #include "qemu/datadir.h"
> +#include "qemu/guest-random.h"
>  #include "qapi/error.h"
>  #include "qapi/qmp/qerror.h"
>  #include "qapi/qapi-visit-common.h"
> @@ -771,7 +772,7 @@ void x86_load_linux(X86MachineState *x86ms,
>      bool linuxboot_dma_enabled = X86_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(x86ms)->fwcfg_dma_enabled;
>      uint16_t protocol;
>      int setup_size, kernel_size, cmdline_size;
> -    int dtb_size, setup_data_offset;
> +    int dtb_size, setup_data_offset, last_setup_data_offset = 0;
>      uint32_t initrd_max;
>      uint8_t header[8192], *setup, *kernel;
>      hwaddr real_addr, prot_addr, cmdline_addr, initrd_addr = 0;
> @@ -1063,16 +1064,30 @@ void x86_load_linux(X86MachineState *x86ms,
>          kernel_size = setup_data_offset + sizeof(struct setup_data) + dtb_size;
>          kernel = g_realloc(kernel, kernel_size);
>  
> -        stq_p(header + 0x250, prot_addr + setup_data_offset);
>          setup_data = (struct setup_data *)(kernel + setup_data_offset);
> -        setup_data->next = 0;
> +        setup_data->next = last_setup_data_offset;

does this make any difference? if the idea is that we'll add more stuff
down the road, then see below ...

>          setup_data->type = cpu_to_le32(SETUP_DTB);
>          setup_data->len = cpu_to_le32(dtb_size);
>  
>          load_image_size(dtb_filename, setup_data->data, dtb_size);
> +
> +        last_setup_data_offset = prot_addr + setup_data_offset;


if the idea is that we'll add more stuff down the road, then
it should be += here.

>      }
>  
> +    setup_data_offset = QEMU_ALIGN_UP(kernel_size, 16);
> +    kernel_size = setup_data_offset + sizeof(struct setup_data) + 32;
> +    kernel = g_realloc(kernel, kernel_size);
> +    setup_data = (struct setup_data *)(kernel + setup_data_offset);
> +    setup_data->next = last_setup_data_offset;

Likely broken on LE.

> +    setup_data->type = cpu_to_le32(SETUP_RNG_SEED);
> +    setup_data->len = cpu_to_le32(32);
> +    qemu_guest_getrandom_nofail(setup_data->data, 32);
> +
> +    last_setup_data_offset = prot_addr + setup_data_offset;


where does this 32 come from? maybe make it a macro.

> +
> +    stq_p(header + 0x250, last_setup_data_offset);

add a comment while we are at it?

> +
>      /*
>       * If we're starting an encrypted VM, it will be OVMF based, which uses the
>       * efi stub for booting and doesn't require any values to be placed in the
> diff --git a/include/standard-headers/asm-x86/bootparam.h b/include/standard-headers/asm-x86/bootparam.h
> index 072e2ed546..b2aaad10e5 100644
> --- a/include/standard-headers/asm-x86/bootparam.h
> +++ b/include/standard-headers/asm-x86/bootparam.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #define SETUP_EFI			4
>  #define SETUP_APPLE_PROPERTIES		5
>  #define SETUP_JAILHOUSE			6
> +#define SETUP_RNG_SEED			9
>  
>  #define SETUP_INDIRECT			(1<<31)
>  
> -- 
> 2.35.1



  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-21 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-11 14:54 [PATCH v3] hw/i386: pass RNG seed via setup_data entry Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-19 11:53 ` [PATCH resend " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-20 13:03   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-21  9:19     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-07-21  9:47       ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-21  9:56         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-21 10:09           ` [PATCH v4] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-21 10:35             ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2022-07-21 10:42               ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-21 10:47                 ` [PATCH v5] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-21 10:49                   ` [PATCH v6] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-21 11:00                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-21 11:00                       ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-21 11:47                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-07-21 12:16                         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-21 12:27                           ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-07-21 12:41                             ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-07-21 12:52                               ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-21 12:56                                 ` [PATCH v7] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-21 13:00                                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-07-21 13:00                                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-07-21 13:04                                     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-22  6:10                                       ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220721062910-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
    --cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.