From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>,
Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>,
Jonathan JMChen <Jonathan.JMChen@mediatek.com>,
Hank <han.lin@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] sched/uclamp: Make task_fits_capacity() use util_fits_cpu()
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 10:19:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220722081913.GA6045@vingu-book> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220721142949.fqmabrjwylkuoltw@wubuntu>
Le jeudi 21 juil. 2022 à 15:29:49 (+0100), Qais Yousef a écrit :
> On 07/12/22 11:48, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > On 07/11/22 15:09, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 at 21:48, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> wrote:
> >
[...]
> > > > @@ -9108,7 +9125,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_wakeup_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
> > > >
> > > > /* Check if task fits in the group */
> > > > if (sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY &&
> > > > - !task_fits_capacity(p, group->sgc->max_capacity)) {
> > > > + !task_fits_cpu(p, group->sgc->max_capacity_cpu)) {
> > >
> > > All the changes and added complexity above for this line. Can't you
> > > find another way ?
> >
> > You're right, I might have got carried away trying to keep the logic the same.
> >
> > Can we use group->asym_prefer_cpu or pick a cpu from group->sgc->cpumask
> > instead?
> >
> > I'll dig more into it anyway and try to come up with simpler alternative.
>
> Actually we can't.
>
> I can keep the current {max,min}_capacity field and just add the new
> {max,min}_capacity_cpu and use them where needed. Should address your concerns
> this way? That was actually the first version of the code, but then it seemed
> redundant to keep both {max,min}_capacity and {max,min}_capacity_cpu.
>
> OR
>
> I can add a new function to search for max spare capacity cpu in the group.
>
> Preference?
>
Isn't the below enough and much simpler ?
[PATCH] sched/uclamp: Make task_fits_capacity() use util_fits_cpu()
So that the new uclamp rules in regard to migration margin and capacity
pressure are taken into account correctly.
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 5eecae32a0f6..3e0c7cc490be 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4317,10 +4317,12 @@ static inline int util_fits_cpu(unsigned long util,
return fits;
}
-static inline int task_fits_capacity(struct task_struct *p,
- unsigned long capacity)
+static inline int task_fits_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
{
- return fits_capacity(uclamp_task_util(p), capacity);
+ unsigned long uclamp_min = uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN);
+ unsigned long uclamp_max = uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX);
+ unsigned long util = task_util_est(p);
+ return util_fits_cpu(util, uclamp_min, uclamp_max, cpu);
}
static inline void update_misfit_status(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
@@ -4333,7 +4335,7 @@ static inline void update_misfit_status(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
return;
}
- if (task_fits_capacity(p, capacity_of(cpu_of(rq)))) {
+ if (task_fits_cpu(p, cpu_of(rq))) {
rq->misfit_task_load = 0;
return;
}
@@ -8104,7 +8106,7 @@ static int detach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
case migrate_misfit:
/* This is not a misfit task */
- if (task_fits_capacity(p, capacity_of(env->src_cpu)))
+ if (task_fits_cpu(p, env->src_cpu))
goto next;
env->imbalance = 0;
@@ -9085,6 +9087,10 @@ static inline void update_sg_wakeup_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
memset(sgs, 0, sizeof(*sgs));
+ /* Assume that task can't fit any CPU of the group */
+ if (sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY)
+ sgs->group_misfit_task_load = 0;
+
for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_span(group)) {
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i);
unsigned int local;
@@ -9104,12 +9110,11 @@ static inline void update_sg_wakeup_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
if (!nr_running && idle_cpu_without(i, p))
sgs->idle_cpus++;
- }
+ /* Check if task fits in the CPU */
+ if (sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY &&
+ task_fits_cpu(p, i))
+ sgs->group_misfit_task_load = 0;
- /* Check if task fits in the group */
- if (sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY &&
- !task_fits_capacity(p, group->sgc->max_capacity)) {
- sgs->group_misfit_task_load = 1;
}
sgs->group_capacity = group->sgc->capacity;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 02c970501295..3292ad2db4ac 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -2988,6 +2988,15 @@ static inline bool uclamp_is_used(void)
return static_branch_likely(&sched_uclamp_used);
}
#else /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */
+static inline unsigned long uclamp_eff_value(struct task_struct *p,
+ enum uclamp_id clamp_id)
+{
+ if (clamp_id == UCLAMP_MIN)
+ return 0;
+
+ return SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
+}
+
static inline
unsigned long uclamp_rq_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned long util,
struct task_struct *p)
--
2.17.1
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Qais Yousef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-22 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-29 19:46 [PATCH 0/7] Fix relationship between uclamp and fits_capacity() Qais Yousef
2022-06-29 19:46 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched/uclamp: Fix relationship between uclamp and migration margin Qais Yousef
2022-07-11 12:36 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-07-12 10:23 ` Qais Yousef
2022-07-12 13:21 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-07-12 14:20 ` Qais Yousef
2022-07-13 12:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-07-15 10:37 ` Qais Yousef
2022-07-20 7:29 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-07-21 14:04 ` Qais Yousef
2022-07-22 15:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-07-27 16:08 ` Qais Yousef
2022-08-04 14:59 ` Qais Yousef
2022-07-20 7:17 ` Xuewen Yan
2022-07-21 10:24 ` Qais Yousef
2022-07-25 11:59 ` Xuewen Yan
2022-07-27 16:25 ` Qais Yousef
2022-08-01 2:46 ` Xuewen Yan
2022-08-02 16:22 ` Qais Yousef
2022-06-29 19:46 ` [PATCH 2/7] sched/uclamp: Make task_fits_capacity() use util_fits_cpu() Qais Yousef
2022-07-11 13:09 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-07-12 10:48 ` Qais Yousef
2022-07-21 14:29 ` Qais Yousef
2022-07-22 8:19 ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2022-07-27 16:05 ` Qais Yousef
2022-08-17 9:48 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-07-20 7:23 ` Xuewen Yan
2022-07-21 14:11 ` Qais Yousef
2022-06-29 19:46 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched/uclamp: Fix fits_capacity() check in feec() Qais Yousef
2022-07-20 7:30 ` Xuewen Yan
2022-07-21 14:19 ` Qais Yousef
2022-06-29 19:46 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched/uclamp: Make select_idle_capacity() use util_fits_cpu() Qais Yousef
2022-06-29 19:46 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched/uclamp: Make asym_fits_capacity() " Qais Yousef
2022-06-29 19:46 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched/uclamp: Make cpu_overutilized() " Qais Yousef
2022-06-29 19:46 ` [PATCH 7/7] sched/uclamp: Cater for uclamp in find_energy_efficient_cpu()'s early exit condition Qais Yousef
2022-07-20 7:39 ` Xuewen Yan
2022-07-21 14:24 ` Qais Yousef
2022-07-22 1:09 ` Xuewen Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220722081913.GA6045@vingu-book \
--to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=Jonathan.JMChen@mediatek.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=han.lin@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=wvw@google.com \
--cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.