All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] workqueue: Unbind workers before sending them to exit()
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 12:53:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220727115327.2273547-2-vschneid@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220727115327.2273547-1-vschneid@redhat.com>

It has been reported that isolated CPUs can suffer from interference due to
per-CPU kworkers waking up just to die.

A surge of workqueue activity during initial setup of a latency-sensitive
application (refresh_vm_stats() being one of the culprits) can cause extra
per-CPU kworkers to be spawned. Then, said latency-sensitive task can be
running merrily on an isolated CPU only to be interrupted sometime later by
a kworker marked for death (cf. IDLE_WORKER_TIMEOUT, 5 minutes after last
kworker activity).

Prevent this by affining kworkers to the wq_unbound_cpumask (which doesn't
contain isolated CPUs, cf. HK_TYPE_WQ) before waking them up after marking
them with WORKER_DIE.

Changing the affinity does require a sleepable context, so get rid of the
pool->idle_timer and use a delayed_work instead.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 1ea50f6be843..27642166dcc5 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -167,9 +167,9 @@ struct worker_pool {
 	int			nr_workers;	/* L: total number of workers */
 	int			nr_idle;	/* L: currently idle workers */
 
-	struct list_head	idle_list;	/* L: list of idle workers */
-	struct timer_list	idle_timer;	/* L: worker idle timeout */
-	struct timer_list	mayday_timer;	/* L: SOS timer for workers */
+	struct list_head	idle_list;	  /* L: list of idle workers */
+	struct delayed_work     idle_reaper_work; /* L: worker idle timeout */
+	struct timer_list	mayday_timer;	  /* L: SOS timer for workers */
 
 	/* a workers is either on busy_hash or idle_list, or the manager */
 	DECLARE_HASHTABLE(busy_hash, BUSY_WORKER_HASH_ORDER);
@@ -1806,8 +1806,10 @@ static void worker_enter_idle(struct worker *worker)
 	/* idle_list is LIFO */
 	list_add(&worker->entry, &pool->idle_list);
 
-	if (too_many_workers(pool) && !timer_pending(&pool->idle_timer))
-		mod_timer(&pool->idle_timer, jiffies + IDLE_WORKER_TIMEOUT);
+	if (too_many_workers(pool) && !delayed_work_pending(&pool->idle_reaper_work))
+		mod_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq,
+				 &pool->idle_reaper_work,
+				 IDLE_WORKER_TIMEOUT);
 
 	/* Sanity check nr_running. */
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(pool->nr_workers == pool->nr_idle && pool->nr_running);
@@ -1972,9 +1974,29 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static void unbind_worker(struct worker *worker)
+{
+	kthread_set_per_cpu(worker->task, -1);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, wq_unbound_cpumask) < 0);
+}
+
+static void rebind_worker(struct worker *worker, struct worker_pool *pool)
+{
+	kthread_set_per_cpu(worker->task, pool->cpu);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
+}
+
+static void reap_worker(struct worker *worker)
+{
+	list_del_init(&worker->entry);
+	unbind_worker(worker);
+	wake_up_process(worker->task);
+}
+
 /**
  * destroy_worker - destroy a workqueue worker
  * @worker: worker to be destroyed
+ * @list: transfer worker away from its pool->idle_list and into list
  *
  * Destroy @worker and adjust @pool stats accordingly.  The worker should
  * be idle.
@@ -1982,7 +2004,7 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
  * CONTEXT:
  * raw_spin_lock_irq(pool->lock).
  */
-static void destroy_worker(struct worker *worker)
+static void destroy_worker(struct worker *worker, struct list_head *list)
 {
 	struct worker_pool *pool = worker->pool;
 
@@ -1997,34 +2019,64 @@ static void destroy_worker(struct worker *worker)
 	pool->nr_workers--;
 	pool->nr_idle--;
 
-	list_del_init(&worker->entry);
+	list_del(&worker->entry);
 	worker->flags |= WORKER_DIE;
-	wake_up_process(worker->task);
+
+	list_add(&worker->entry, list);
 }
 
-static void idle_worker_timeout(struct timer_list *t)
+/**
+ * idle_reaper_fn - reap workers that have been idle for too long.
+ *
+ * Unbinding marked-for-destruction workers requires a sleepable context, as
+ * changing a task's affinity is not an atomic operation, and we don't want
+ * to disturb isolated CPUs IDLE_WORKER_TIMEOUT in the future just for a kworker
+ * to do_exit().
+ *
+ * Percpu kworkers should meet the conditions for the affinity change to not
+ * block (not migration-disabled and not running), but there is no *hard*
+ * guarantee that they are not running when we get here.
+ *
+ * The delayed_work is only ever modified under raw_spin_lock_irq(pool->lock).
+ */
+static void idle_reaper_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 {
-	struct worker_pool *pool = from_timer(pool, t, idle_timer);
+	struct delayed_work *dwork = to_delayed_work(work);
+	struct worker_pool *pool = container_of(dwork, struct worker_pool, idle_reaper_work);
+	struct list_head reaplist;
+	struct worker *worker, *tmp;
+
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&reaplist);
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
 	while (too_many_workers(pool)) {
-		struct worker *worker;
 		unsigned long expires;
+		unsigned long now = jiffies;
 
 		/* idle_list is kept in LIFO order, check the last one */
 		worker = list_entry(pool->idle_list.prev, struct worker, entry);
 		expires = worker->last_active + IDLE_WORKER_TIMEOUT;
 
-		if (time_before(jiffies, expires)) {
-			mod_timer(&pool->idle_timer, expires);
+		/*
+		 * Careful: queueing a work item from here can and will cause a
+		 * self-deadlock when dealing with an unbound pool. However,
+		 * here the delay *cannot* be zero and *has* to be in the
+		 * future, which works.
+		 */
+		if (time_before(now, expires)) {
+			mod_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq,
+					 &pool->idle_reaper_work,
+					 expires - now);
 			break;
 		}
 
-		destroy_worker(worker);
+		destroy_worker(worker, &reaplist);
 	}
-
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(worker, tmp, &reaplist, entry)
+		reap_worker(worker);
 }
 
 static void send_mayday(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -3454,7 +3506,7 @@ static int init_worker_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->idle_list);
 	hash_init(pool->busy_hash);
 
-	timer_setup(&pool->idle_timer, idle_worker_timeout, TIMER_DEFERRABLE);
+	INIT_DEFERRABLE_WORK(&pool->idle_reaper_work, idle_reaper_fn);
 
 	timer_setup(&pool->mayday_timer, pool_mayday_timeout, 0);
 
@@ -3559,7 +3611,10 @@ static bool wq_manager_inactive(struct worker_pool *pool)
 static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
 {
 	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(detach_completion);
-	struct worker *worker;
+	struct list_head dlist;
+	struct worker *worker, *tmp;
+
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dlist);
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
@@ -3588,10 +3643,13 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
 	pool->flags |= POOL_MANAGER_ACTIVE;
 
 	while ((worker = first_idle_worker(pool)))
-		destroy_worker(worker);
+		destroy_worker(worker, &dlist);
 	WARN_ON(pool->nr_workers || pool->nr_idle);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(worker, tmp, &dlist, entry)
+		reap_worker(worker);
+
 	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);
 	if (!list_empty(&pool->workers))
 		pool->detach_completion = &detach_completion;
@@ -3601,7 +3659,7 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
 		wait_for_completion(pool->detach_completion);
 
 	/* shut down the timers */
-	del_timer_sync(&pool->idle_timer);
+	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&pool->idle_reaper_work);
 	del_timer_sync(&pool->mayday_timer);
 
 	/* RCU protected to allow dereferences from get_work_pool() */
@@ -4999,10 +5057,8 @@ static void unbind_workers(int cpu)
 
 		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
-		for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) {
-			kthread_set_per_cpu(worker->task, -1);
-			WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, wq_unbound_cpumask) < 0);
-		}
+		for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool)
+			unbind_worker(worker);
 
 		mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);
 	}
@@ -5027,11 +5083,8 @@ static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
 	 * of all workers first and then clear UNBOUND.  As we're called
 	 * from CPU_ONLINE, the following shouldn't fail.
 	 */
-	for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) {
-		kthread_set_per_cpu(worker->task, pool->cpu);
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task,
-						  pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
-	}
+	for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool)
+		rebind_worker(worker, pool);
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
-- 
2.31.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-27 11:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-27 11:53 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] workqueue: destroy_worker() vs isolated CPUs Valentin Schneider
2022-07-27 11:53 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2022-07-27 17:13   ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] workqueue: Unbind workers before sending them to exit() Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-28 10:54     ` Valentin Schneider
2022-07-28 16:35       ` Tejun Heo
2022-07-28 17:24         ` Valentin Schneider
2022-07-28 17:31           ` Tejun Heo
2022-07-29 10:12             ` Valentin Schneider
2022-07-27 11:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] DEBUG: workqueue: kworker spawner Valentin Schneider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220727115327.2273547-2-vschneid@redhat.com \
    --to=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.